K. Chandrika vs K. Prasannakumari on 17 December, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RSA.No. 1092 of 2003()


1. K. CHANDRIKA, T.C. 4/2313/(M),
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K. PRASANNAKUMARI, RESIDING IN
                       ...       Respondent

2. P. SREELATHA OF  DO.   DO.

3. P. LEKHA OF   DO.  DO.

4. DR. GOPAKUMAR, RESIDING IN `REVATHI',

5. K. PREMAKUMARI, RESIDING IN

6. N. ANIL, RESIDING AT 1/10, JAWAHAR

7. C. ASHA N. KUMAR, OF DO. DO.

8. P. RAMACHANDRAN, RESIDING IN PULINGAL

9. K. SURENDRAN, DHARMA MUDUMPA VEEDU,

10. SMITHA, D/O RAMACHANDRAN, PHYLINGAL

11. N. LATHA, W/O MOHANA PRASAD,

12. L. SUNETHA, D/O LATE R/ MOHANA PRASAD,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.E.SUBRAMANI

                For Respondent  :SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH

 Dated :17/12/2009

 O R D E R
                           THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.
                          --------------------------------------
                             R.S.A.No.1092 of 2003
                          --------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009.

                                    JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for appellant submits that he has no instruction from the

appellant.

2. Case is being posted for curing the defects. Steps were ordered on

28.10.2009 and then on 25.11.2009 but still, steps are not taken. Learned

counsel for appellant submits that a registered letter was sent to the appellant

well on time requiring appellant to take necessary steps but the registered letter

has been returned with the endorsement that “house locked, Absent”.

Sufficient opportunity was given to the appellant to take steps. That has

not been availed. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.

I.A.No.1330 of 2003 will stand dismissed.

THOMAS P.JOSEPH,
Judge.

cks