High Court Kerala High Court

K.E. Jamal vs State Of Kerala on 14 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
K.E. Jamal vs State Of Kerala on 14 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 19547 of 2008(B)


1. K.E. JAMAL, S/O.IBRAHIM, AGED 48,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :DR.SEBASTIAN CHAMPAPPILLY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :14/07/2008

 O R D E R
                             V.GIRI,J.
                      -------------------------
                 W.P ( C) No. 19547 of 2008
                      --------------------------
                Dated this the 14th July, 2008

                        J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is under suspension pursuant to the

registration of Crime No.1437 of 2005 for offences under

Section 384, 419, 420 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, inter

alia, on an allegation from one Hijas that petitioner had

demanded money from him for allowing him to conduct a

Single Digit Lottery. CC.No.21 of 2007 is being

prosecuted before the Judicial First Class Magistrate

Court, Aluva. Though the departmental enquiry was

initiated and completed, final orders have not been passed

in view of the pendency of criminal prosecution.

Essentially petitioner has sought for a direction to

complete the criminal proceedings, I cannot do it in these

proceedings as such.

2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,

submits that on completion of the departmental enquiry,

a report has been forwarded to the Government and the

W.P ( C) No. 19547 of 2008
2

matter is pending before the Government. The request

made by the petitioner for reinstatement in service after

revocation of suspension is pending before the Government.

Government will take a decision thereon without any

further delay, it is submitted.

3. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the 1st respondent to pass orders on the

petitioner’s request for revocation of suspension within six

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Petitioner shall produce a copy the judgment along

with copy of the writ petition and also a representation

reiterating his request for revocation of suspension before

the 1st respondent, for compliance.

(V.GIRI, JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No. 19547 of 2008
2

W.P ( C) No. 19547 of 2008
2