1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA A'? BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13'? DAY OF OCTOBER 2010
PRESENT
'THE HON'BLE MR.J.S.KHEHAR, CHIEF JL;sfP£§: g§ A'
AND
THE §~ION'BLE MR.JUS'¥"£CE';:;4$:.:B-;3PANSA§;: = T_
W1'*itPetiti0n No.3029Q,i21o10{cS:;REs~?1L) " %
Between :
1. K H Shivaiingappa' .,
s/0 Hoxmegewda " 'M _T
Aged about y€:a1's_._ V
2.
W / ::ivvPa:*Jat}1&:g«{>jWda Q ~ - __
Aged' about ._ . é '
3. SmtR€-fiiuka A %
w_I(3 Bhaxifiamuayakv
V. , fXgC;e:(;.._aba}1t 45
%_ VS':;1t§;'E%"e;§:§a-yathi
~. W?/0 'V'siSe;:2§rjkxnna1'
Afigeclvalgfiut 40 years
.. SI;ii;.V]§S3agarathna W/O Lokesh
V' ' 'Aged about 32 years
3;
'Sim: Grzetha W/G Basavaraju
Aged about 40 years
~ Smt Hernavathi
W/0 D.Mai1esh,
Aged about 32 years
8. Smt Savithramma
W/O Sridhar
Aged about 48 years
A1] are 1*/<3 Adaguru Kodihaily Village
Madihalli Hobli, Belur Taluk
Hassan District
(By Sri I) C Jagacieesh, adv.,V)
And : '
1, The Assistant Registrarwef "
Co--operative Societigese if g AA
Sakieshpura Sub~Diirisir)i1'
Sakieshpures --
Hassan District
2. The M'ana'gi»:ig'Diréé'mi'
I*ias§ari'~13'i5;Ei7i,<.':t "
P;g50duCe'15s_C0?V'aOp..< Fedelation Ltd.,
T}, District", Hassan
3. Sim Mehafi
,v:--/ 0 Shia*egow'da'-
g '~'Age::1 about-"~§{)___3{ears
Chief Promoter
' ' ~ . Ad;g:gu:i1i"{<odihaH3: Viilage
" . . ""*Be1u{--"T1fa:§;uk, Has-sax} District
A' - Biria,tiétia11i».Iriobii
... Respondents
" '=. "{By_SI:i'B:asavaraj Kareddy, Pr1.G.A. for R4)
_ -'This wrii petifion is filed under Articles 226 and
" 2:27 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the 1st
"';"esponde11t to consider the representation of the
petitioners vicie AI'1I1exures--A and B feifixwith in
accordance with law.
WWW
This writ petition coming on for preliminary
hearing this day, Chief Justice made the following :
ORDER
J.S.Kheha1′, CR}. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners stai.es,.
petitioners will be satisfied, if the
disposed of, with a direction to
decision on the representation filed by”‘the’Apeti{ioIiers on V
28.7.2010 (A11nexure§A}– :t;g=.%%z;6:;qéd 1.g;l.é1ted 30.7.2010
N01. On our asking,
Mr.Bas;¢;a;_araj ‘1eér’:1ed Principal Government
Advocate accepts on behalf of respondent No. 1.
= Lee1’ne”d’?ri11cipa} Government Advocate for
I€.o_}~1 states, that he has no obgection to the
o1’Wi.he irlstarit writ petition, in terms of the
prayer-v.t.iiade by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. in View of the above, without going into the
__r.§1e.im raised by the petitioners on merits, we consider it
just and appropriate :0 dispose of the ifls1:ax1t__.__writ
petition, by directing respondent No.1 to
decision on the representation dated-jg:”28.:?’;:§O ”
(AI1I1ox11I*e~A) and legal notice »._Adaiédr f§(}¢§’.?Q}{}.,A
(An:aexuro~B), by passing V a –
order, within two months frosxfixsthe “da1.;e-.of_:récVéipt ‘of a
certified copy of this o1′{1_er.
Disposed of in ”
Sd/-
Chief Justices
Sd/-.
Judge
lndsxz yes/4i:1o