High Court Kerala High Court

K.J.Jos vs K.K.Antony on 1 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
K.J.Jos vs K.K.Antony on 1 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 1741 of 2009()


1. K.J.JOS, S/O. KANNATHUKUZHI JOSEPH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.K.ANTONY, S/O. KUNJI VAREED,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :01/06/2009

 O R D E R
              M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

              ------------------------------------------
               CRL.M.C.NO.1741 OF 2009
              ------------------------------------------

                 Dated       1st     June 2009


                           O R D E R

Petitioner was convicted for the offence

under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. He

challenged the conviction before Sessions court,

Thrissur in Crl.A.57/2009. Crl.M.P.456/2009 was filed

to suspend the sentence. Under Annexure-A2 order

learned Sessions Judge suspended the sentence on

condition that petitioner shall execute a bond with

two solvent sureties for Rs.1,50,000/- and also on

deposit of Rs.40,000/- within three months. This

petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of

Criminal Procedure to quash the condition to deposit

money contending that petitioner is not in a position

to deposit the amount and learned Sessions Judge

should not have imposed such a condition.

2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner

was heard.

3. On hearing the learned counsel, I do

not find any illegality in Annexure-A2 order

CRMC 1741/09 2

warranting interference on the direction to deposit

portion of the cheque amount. Dishonoured cheque is for

Rs.2,82,000/-. Petitioner was found guilty. The

conviction and sentence are challenged before learned

Sessions Judge. In such circumstances, direction to

deposit Rs.40,000/- as condition to suspend the sentence

cannot be said to be illegal or unwarranted. Learned

counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that as the

time expired, one month time may be granted to comply

with the condition. Petitioner is granted one month’s

time from today to comply with the condition. If case

of the petitioner is that he is not financially sound

to deposit the amount, he is at liberty to move the

Sessions court to dispose the appeal at the earliest.

Petition is dismissed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE.

uj.