High Court Kerala High Court

K.J.Paul vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010

Kerala High Court
K.J.Paul vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3476 of 2010()


1. K.J.PAUL, AGED 75 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. C.A.RAPPAI, AGED 74 YEARS,
3. M.A.PAUL, AGED 67 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :13/07/2010

 O R D E R
                                K.HEMA, J.
                             ------------------
                        B.A. No. 3476 of 2010
                       -----------------------------
                Dated this the 13th day of July, 2010

                                O R D E R

This petition is for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 405, 406, 417

and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to

prosecution, petitioners(accused nos. 1 to 3) in furtherance of their

common intention, while acting as the chairman and partners of one

firm sold to property of the firm and misappropriated the amounts and

committed cheating etc.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that an extent of

property was sold, as per a decision of the general body meeting, as

evidenced by Annexure-A. De facto complainant is the husband of one

of the partners, who is also a signatory to Anenxure-A. Petitioners

have not sold the property in any fraudulent manner and they have

not misappropriated any fund, it is submitted.

4. Learned counsel for petitioners also submitted that petitioners

requested for an opportunity to explain their innocence before the

police by producing relevant documents. They were directed by this

court to report before the investigating officer and accordingly they

appeared and they were questioned by him.

B.A. No. 3476/ 2010 2

5. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioners were

questioned by the investigating officer, when he appeared before him

as per the directions of this court. He has no objection in granting

anticipatory bail on conditions, it is submitted.

6. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that petitioners can be

granted anticipatory bail on the conditions. Hence, the following order

is passed:

1. Petitioners shall, in the event of their arrest

be released on bail on his executing bond

for Rs. 25,000/- each with two solvent

sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer on

condition that petitioners shall report before

the investigating officer as and when directed

and co-operate with the investigation.

2). This order will be in force only for a period of

20 days from today and petitioners shall seek

regular bail from the court concerned within

such time.

This petition is allowed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE
ln