High Court Kerala High Court

K.Jafar vs Sri.U.Muhammed Ali on 6 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
K.Jafar vs Sri.U.Muhammed Ali on 6 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 2769 of 2008()


1. K.JAFAR, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.VEERANKUTTY
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SRI.U.MUHAMMED ALI, CHOONAKKAL HOUSE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  :SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :06/10/2009

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                 M.A.C.A. NO. 2769 OF 2008
             = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
       Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009.

                      J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode in O.P.(MV)2696/03.

The claimant is alleged to have sustained injuries in a road

accident and the Tribunal dismissed the claim holding that

things are not proved. The learned counsel had made

available before me a copy of the wound certificate and

certain other documents and requested the Court to give an

opportunity to prove the case. It is true that there is some

delay in even issuance of wound certificate and filing of the

case. These are all matters which can be considered by the

Court. If the claimant is able to satisfy the conscience of the

Court regarding the genuineness of the case, the Court can

act upon it and direct the parties to adduce oral evidence as

well. Unfortunately the claimant has not impleaded the

driver. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that when a

case is filed u/s 166 of the M.V.Act it is always necessary to

M.A.C.A. 2769 OF 2008
-:2:-

implead the driver unless it is admitted that the negligence is

on the part of the driver. Therefore the claimant may be

permitted to implead the the driver as well.

2. In the result the award under challenge is set

aside and the matter is remitted back to the Tribunal with a

direction to permit the claimant to implead the driver, then

produce documentary as well as oral evidence in support of

the contentions.

Needless to say the insurance company is also

permitted to produce documents in support of its contentions

and let the matter be disposed of in accordance with law.

Parties are directed to appear before the Court below on

23.11.2009.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-