High Court Karnataka High Court

K John Kennedy vs The Bangalore Development … on 21 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
K John Kennedy vs The Bangalore Development … on 21 September, 2010
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE

myrsa THIS THE 218? DAY 01%' SEPTEMBER, 
BEFORE V% % VA

THE !~ION'BLE MRJUSTICE RAM grmm %  'A  

WRIT PETITION No. 269$1  gm {13n3»)V:L'%"T_ 
BETWEEN : " ' ' « '
K JOHN KENNEDY
S/O. M: KURASU MICHAEL
AGE 47 YEARS % =

R/AT NO. 6, 151' BLOCK,V338-Dr:RQ{3S'= [j~  A 
AKSHAYANAGAR, BANGALQ:>j::'~: 1€_».~..._ * .  ._ PETITIONER

{BY  Mti3'Ti':x1A1Vi1jAE{;'ApK.Z) _~
AND: A . A ' 3

TH E BAN G"AL§)REv"DEvEi1;0 PM ENT AUTHORITY
T c::;;iow*DA:AH =:--?2_QAD_, KUMARA PARK WEST

' V'  ABEaNG;IXL.O;f.?£3 M 29' """ "
» I:'{1E»'.1?.BY'lT$_(3QMMlSS1ONER.  RESPONDENT

~I B.¥_s1%*i1S~§:Ii3iANDRzxs£aEK1–IAIQ EBABU. ADV)

*;5:§»i1s””\v1T2.1T PETITION IS I+-‘ILE-D UNDER ART1c1,.I3:s 228
A1.\’§I)”fZ2I’~?” OF THE? CONST£’I’U’1’IO1\E OF INDIA PRAYING TO

A QE_JASI{ ‘1’1—-1:«: CANCELLATION ORDER DATED 22.3.10 VIBE
_ Awzxiwg PASSEE) BY T;-~11«; RESPONDENT; Am.) RIC.

” V’ ” “GROUP, TTIIS DAY, ‘FI”l}3 COURT MADE THE FOLI,OW’IN

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRL.Pi’EARING IN ‘B’

‘3»

OI£I–;ER

‘we’

The petifionel’ purchaseéi site No.20»-439 \x2*1*1iVé;I1’_ u.;fas

allotted to his vzmdor in title and (:011\?ey¢fd””Lif1d_ief

reg,istt31*ed saie deed executecl by the I32mga1cV:–‘£: i1}::Ve–I§§p.me:jt ‘

Authority for short BLDA, for a vajiiuab1¢ ‘cjohsid(;rafia1′;»._LL Vfifhcf’

BDA having r1ot:iCed that the saiti si1.e ::,21 ;~,:,.E:vEi 1 0i;}1.”‘0tV’.”VL.

Sy.N0.147 was not £1CqL1iI'(“L”(VZ’i’->,VL “.c5’t.$7Id theréfa-fe, fifécanceiled
allotment”. it is in t.11is’sbgckdritifioifj’ the vpV$’€A:t’iAiior1er has

come before court. for dir€j:’c;fi{)1.} respondent to

. . ‘ . ll _
consider f@r.–211?i.0i.111e11’€ 013.1’: a3te_rr1a.te site.

22.’ VI{eC:cfi’dii*1g T’*-._’,~ {he submission of

S1’i.M.S.C1;1L£t:1d1′;a,SVh€i}{a1; V’~{3:abu, iearneci Counsel for the

the pet:itio’r2e1″s claim for altemate

‘s.ité:>:= -considereci and orders passed thereon in

efi;ctL:i:v19d211.”i.(:a:9: jv»§:”‘L’11 law. if g1’e1n€4ed reasonable 1.i.m<-3, nothing

£i1ri:h:=,;r 'sL:fvives for c0;1side1*at..i0n in this pe1;itio11 and is,

" .. aiL:'COfdifig1y disposed of.

A’E’wc3″r1103’1t.hs t:1’mc=. for c:11p}.i.aI1.ce.