High Court Kerala High Court

K.K.Narayanan vs State Of Kerala on 15 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
K.K.Narayanan vs State Of Kerala on 15 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7783 of 2009()


1. K.K.NARAYANAN, S/O.KANNAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SASEENDRAN T.V., S/O.KUNHIKANARAN,
3. SANTHOSHKUMAR.T.M., S/O.RAJAN PILLAI,
4. SHAJAHAN, S/O.ALIKUTTY,
5. SIVANANDAN.P.M., S/O.KUNHIRAMAN,
6. RAMESHAN.K.V., S/O.KAMARAN,
7. PRADEEPKUMAR.V., S/O.NARAYANAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SANTHARAM.P

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :15/01/2010

 O R D E R
                          K.T.SANKARAN, J.
             ------------------------------------------------------
                       B.A. NO. 7783 OF 2009
             ------------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 15th day of January, 2010


                                O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused Nos.1

to 7 in Crime No.745 of 2009 of Koyilandy Police Station, Kozhikode

District.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Sections 143, 148, 448, 188 and 353 read with Section 149 of the

Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on 8.1.2010,

the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor, I am of

the view that before disposing of the Bail Application,

an opportunity should be given to the petitioners to

appear before the investigating officer. Accordingly,

there will be a direction to the petitioners to appear

B.A. NO. 7783 OF 2009

:: 2 ::

before the investigating officer at 9 AM on 10th

January, 2010.

Post on 15.1.2010.

It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor

that the petitioners will not be arrested until further

orders in connection with Crime No.745 of 2009 of

Koyilandy Police Station, Kozhikode.

The petitioners shall produce copy of this order

before the investigating officer.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners as

well as the learned Public Prosecutor that the direction in the order

dated 8.1.2010 has been complied with by the petitioners.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and also taking note of the fact that

the direction in the order dated 8.1.2010 has been complied with by

the petitioners, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted

to the petitioners. There will be a direction that in the event of the

arrest of the petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station

shall release them on bail on their executing bond for Rs.15,000/-

each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction

B.A. NO. 7783 OF 2009

:: 3 ::

of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

a) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating
officer for interrogation as and when required;

b) The petitioners shall not try to influence the prosecution
witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

c) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or indulge
in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

d) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned
above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

ahz/