IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 14457 of 2009(B)
1. K.K. RAMAN, AGED 70,
... Petitioner
2. GOPAKUMAR.A.R,
3. C.P. RAMAKURUPU,
4. P.S. VARGHESE,
5. GEETHA, AGED 48,
6. SASI.P.R,
7. A.M. MANOHARAN,
8. BINU P. THOMAS,
9. ROY P. THOMAS,
10. SANTHAMMA VARGHESE,
Vs
1. THE AYARKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE
... Respondent
2. K.K. MOHANAN,
3. THE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE
4. JOINT REGISTRAR (AUDIT)
5. THE REGIONAL MANAGER,
6. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
7. UNION OF INDIA,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.M.SEBASTIAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :27/05/2009
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
================
W.P.(C) NO. 14457 OF 2009 (B)
=====================
Dated this the 27th day of May, 2009
J U D G M E N T
Petitioners have availed of agricultural loans from the 1st
respondent Bank. It is stated that amounts are in default and
while so, the Government of India announced Agricultural Debt
Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008, a copy of which is Ext.P1.
Petitioners say that they have submitted applications for the
benefit of Ext.P1. According to the petitioners, although their
cases have been recommended by the 2nd respondent, final
orders allowing the benefit has not been passed by the 1st
respondent so far. In these circumstances they have filed
Ext.P11, a joint petition before the 1st respondent and even on
that representation, there has not been any response. It is in
these circumstances, the writ petition is filed.
Thus, it is obvious that the claim of the petitioners for the
benefit of Ext.P1 waiver scheme referred to above is still pending
consideration of the respondents. In view of this, I dispose of this
writ petition directing respondents 1 and 2 to decide on Ext.P11.
WPC 14457/09
:2 :
This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within
6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a
copy of this writ petition.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp