K Kalpana vs G K Venkat Rao on 10 November, 2010

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE mm DAY OF NOVEMBER 2oE1~0i"re._:%%

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND ABY'ROARE;£§i3Y'_'_:»AV  

MISCELLANOUS   E-r==-IAPPEBAL M;.OV67O02 EOE  A E 

BETWEEN:

1. Smt. K. Kalpana V V_ ;
Aged about 32 years,"n  _   ;
W/0 A.R. Purushotham,  _  '

2. Sri. A.R.     
Aged     »
S/o R. Ra.§nafiswj_amy.'  E_  '

Both I and 2 re_siOding..ai"No;3'I'5_,_ _ '

11"" Cross;T10ih4_1\/Iain)'CV.   2

Indiranagar lLSiage,'-- ' V' . 

Bangalore -- 56'O038._]_   ...APPELLANTS

 3 {By '  Shyam&KoDadi':1ya, Advocate)

 V B' Sri. G:~K. Venkai Rao

 é 'Aged about years,
H "   '   Krishhamurthy,

  i7_r"cprietor,
2   GKV Stocks,

  No.'?68, I0--C Cross,



5&1 Main, 2'" Stage,
West of Chord Road,  
Bangalore ~« 560 086. ...RESPONDiENT A'

(By M/s N upor Associates, Advocate for CaV€flt01'/RESl:)O§1tl0l.il)'   


This appeal is filed under Section,_37:_fla).,loft'Arbitra.tion..arid*
Conciliation Act, 1996, against the judgment and Vdecree dated 

17.02.2006 passed in A.s.No.22;/2003 on. the file =-i)jf«-v..the-* VI 

Additional City Civil Judge, 'Bangalorel"._Citj;7 (CCH--ll),
dismissing the appeal filed under sectio'n._34.._of the"A.rl;)itration and
Conciliation Act, [996 to set-._asi(ie the" award dated 02.05.2002
and further award dated (}3.03.'200.3}  by the learned
arbitrators, " . vi '  

This appeal: cldi;riing,v:lonifor Ii?§1rthelr"Ofders this day, the

Court delivered'the_fol'i-oW_ing:.,}.._   V_ A

 1111    

The lparties' and'«.ti:eirv4co--t1nsel have filed a joint memo to

state that the m_atter'has been settled in terms of the joint memo.

  A  2,,-Aceordinliglliy,'the appeal stands disposed of in terms

oi' the joint = . V 0.0.»



3. The respondent acknowledges handing over of "

dated cheques in favour of the respondent. The respondent * H

the order sheet in this regard.

E

*a1b/~.