High Court Kerala High Court

K.Kunhayamu Kurikkal vs M.Kunhammad on 9 August, 2006

Kerala High Court
K.Kunhayamu Kurikkal vs M.Kunhammad on 9 August, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 1287 of 2002()


1. K.KUNHAYAMU KURIKKAL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. M.KUNHAMMAD, S/O.MUHAMMED,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :09/08/2006

 O R D E R
                                  R. BASANT, J.
                           - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                          Crl.R.P.No.  1287 of   2002
                          -  - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                  Dated this the  9th day of   August, 2006


                                      O R D E R

This revision petition is directed against the concurrent verdict

of guilty, conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 138

of the N.I. Act.

2. When this revision petition came up for hearing, it is

submitted at the Bar by counsel for the rival contestants that the

matter has been settled and the offence has been compounded by the

complainant. A joint compromise petition duly signed by the rival

contestants and counter signed by their respective counsel is also

filed. The learned counsel for the respondent/complainant vouches

that the signature appearing in the application for composition is that

of the complainant.

3. The offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is now

compoundable after the amendment to the N.I. Act. I am satisfied,

from the submissions made at the Bar and the joint statement filed by

Crl.R.P.No. 1287 of 2002 2

them, that the parties have settled their dispute amicably. I find no reason

not to accept the composition.

4. In the result:

(a) Crl.M.A.No. 7734 of 2006 is allowed and the composition is

accepted.

(b) The acceptance of the composition shall have the effect of

acquittal of the accused of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the

N.I. Act as stipulated under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C.

) Consequently, this revision petition is allowed. The impugned

judgments are set aside. The bail bond executed by the accused shall stand

discharged and he is set at liberty.

5. It is said that an amount of Rs.77,500/- is in deposit before the

trial court. The counsel pray that the said amount may be released to the

respondent/complainant. Request accepted. The amount, if any, deposited

shall be released forthwith to the complainant/respondent herein.

(R. BASANT)

Crl.R.P.No. 1287 of 2002 3

Judge

tm

R. BASANT, J.

——————————————

Crl.R.P.No. 1287 of 2003

——————————————

O R D E R

9th August, 2006

Crl.R.P.No. 1287 of 2002 4