High Court Kerala High Court

K.Lotus Simon vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 14 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
K.Lotus Simon vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 14 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 19764 of 2009(M)


1. K.LOTUS SIMON, MUSIC TEACHER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

5. THE MANAGER ST. MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL,]

6. SMT. E.S.SREELATHA MUSIC TEACHER,

7. THE HEADMISTRESS, ST.MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :14/07/2009

 O R D E R
                            S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
                      ==================
                        W.P(C).No.19764 of 2009
                      ==================
                  Dated this the 14th day of July, 2009

                             J U D G M E N T

The petitioner and the 6th respondent are music teachers in the

5th respondent’s school. The petitioner is senior to the 6th respondent,

but she is recognised as a protected teacher. The 6th respondent,

though junior to the petitioner, is accommodated in a regular post. The

petitioner contends that this is against the Division Bench decision of

this Court in Rani George v. Deputy Director of Education [2004 (1)

KLT 460]. In this regard against the order passed by the Director of

Public Instructions, the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 revision petition

before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st

respondent to consider Ext.P4 revision and pass orders thereon

expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.

3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this

writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and

pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 revision petition, as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of a

certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being

heard to the petitioner and respondents 5 and 6.

Sd/-

sdk+                                              S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
          ///True copy///
                              P.A. to Judge

2