IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 19187 of 2010(W)
1. K.M.DASAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER - I,
... Respondent
2. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
For Petitioner :SRI.VIJAYAN. K.U.
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :05/07/2010
O R D E R
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
--------------------------------------------
WP(C) NO. 19187 OF 2010
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 5th day of July, 2010
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated as aggrieved of Ext.P5 order passed by the 1st
respondent; whereby the application for registration has been rejected. Many
a ground has been raised in the Writ Petition, referring to binding judicial
precedents as well.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the course
pursued by the petitioner is per-se wrong and illegal; which made the
petitioner to approach this Court; especially when the right to do business is
adversely effected.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
4. Going by the materials on record, it is very much evident that,
Ext.P5 order passed by the 1st respondent is very much appealable.
Accordingly, the petitioner is relegated to pursue the statutory remedy by way
of appeal. If any such appeal is filed within one week from the date of receipt
of a copy of this judgment, the same shall be considered and finalized by the
appellate authority in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of
receipt of the appeal.
The Writ Petition is dismissed.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE
dnc