K.M. George vs T.P.Senkumar on 6 February, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con Case(C) No. 101 of 2008(S)


1. K.M. GEORGE, S/O. MATHEW,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. T.P.SENKUMAR,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.C.HARIDAS

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :06/02/2008

 O R D E R
                             S. SIRI JAGAN, J.

                    ------------------------------------

                         C.O.C. No.101  OF 2008

                 ----------------------------------------

                  Dated this the 6th day of February, 2008


                                 JUDGMENT

Both sides agree that the amount has been deposited by the

respondent before the Tribunal. However the learned counsel for

the petitioner submits that the entire amount has not been

deposited.

2. According to the learned counsel for the respondent,

as per their calculation, the amount deposited represents the

actual amount due under the award.

In the above circumstances, the contempt case is closed

without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to question the

correctness of the amount deposited by the respondent before

the Tribunal by initiating appropriate proceedings before the

Tribunal.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd