K M Prakash vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 25 June, 2008

1

IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNA'1'AKA,  

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAXVOF Juirqrs gem    A

BEFORE  T   X
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE: 1V£.(:)i=Lfi;;-N ia:::ij1jY
wgrr Pmmommo. 9,002 (30; ST)

BETWEEN :

KMPRAKASHV44  _   
S/O.MAVK?Hl5REGGWD"A" *  7'
AGED    
RIA .1;:oo1*H.AGALE;"wL1.A-GE: 
uwYAMBAL:,1'E§G£3L3   I
I~:ANAKAPU.RA TQ, V     
BANGALGRE RURA"LL-.1sT_, %

 " .    ...PETITIONER

   my   LGOWDA, M L PRAKASH as 1* R ?APANNA, ADV)
 _ {A;s4s_Er4rr';_  A 

AN?) :

 .% 1 Vmis DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

 BANGALORE RURAL DIST

' VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWER
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALC)RE~1

2 THE ASST COMMISSIONER
RAMANAGARAM SUB DIVN.,
RAMANAGARAM, BLORE RURAL DIST. MK

3 NEELAMMA



D / 0. BHADRAIAH
R/ABODDAKOPPA VILLAGE 
UWYAMBALLI HOBLI '  

KANAKAPURA TQ, BLGRE Rli_RA1-,l«f)f¥.S"T,..:4...'  " R M V

4 DODDAMMA  
D /0.LATE BHADRAIAH  
MAJOR, R[A.I'I"I'AMADU WLL. _
MARUTI NAGAR, z-BSK I1I~-'SERGE-~-. _
BLORE--56O 035    R "  . 

5 BASAVAIAH   V
S/O.LATE-'BHADRAIAH: _  -  *
MAJOR,' R jg.-.noDDAKOPPA VILLAGE
UwYR1s.1BALI..1;'1_H0B1..I,..RA.NARARU RA TQ
BANGALORE R1IRA1';.Dl""i!'. " 

6 RENUKAASHWATH BANGAIEZA _
W]O.LATEAASHWATH-RBANGARA' -
Nc:>.125, C."P.BED  *  
BSK III STAGE, BANGALORE'

     ...RESP()NDEN'i'S

(BY:-M  A:~$A'1~1';iR1 1aR1sH§iAEv:URTRY 3:. M8,, ADV FOR R6)
(By sz1_:.M-R1VR.A_qA.eQRAL, ADV FOR R36)

'   THIS $§)*%R1T_P1éi?m'1oR IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 225

VAND 227 OF THE 'C5C)NSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
.--QU~ASH_, THE OR{7ER CF E1 DT. 21.5.2002 VIDE ANN--G

AND. FIJRTHER 'QUASH THE ORDER m'. 14.6.2002 BY WAY

 '  s0RR1GEm>UM VIDE ANDLH.

 'RjR'TEi.I_S:.'DAY THE COURT MADE THE FQLLOWINGE

VT  PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING,





ORDER

There is no representation ffbr tl1<*:._ 1';l€ti;?.i(IT)V:I.};E51'VW1"f(3I}V".

the case is called. The petitiofiis Afaf'

non prosecution.

csg