High Court Kerala High Court

K.M.Rakesh vs State Of Kerala on 10 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
K.M.Rakesh vs State Of Kerala on 10 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3396 of 2008()


1. K.M.RAKESH, AGED 27 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. K.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 35 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :10/06/2008

 O R D E R
                            K.HEMA, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                         B.A.No.3396 of 2008
                   -------------------------------------------
               Dated this the 10th day of June, 2008

                                   ORDER

Petition for anticipatory bail.

2. According to the prosecution, petitioners allegedly

assaulted the defacto complainant and committed offences under

Sections 341, 323 and 324 read with 34 IPC.

3. Learned public prosecutor submitted that the

petitioners are required for recovery of weapon and a fracture is

also caused to the defacto complainant and hence, the

application is opposed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

incident happened in front of the house of the first accused. It is

alleged that the defacto complainant was under the influence of

alcohol at the time offence and later, realising the mistake

committed by him, he settled the entire issues and both parties

have come to an amicable settlement. They are maintaining a

good relationship between each other now. Annexure I is an

affidavit sworn to by the defacto complainant and filed before

the Sessions Court, Kasaragod in the bail application filed by

him. It is also submitted that the petitioner is undergoing a

BA NO.3396/2008 2

training at ‘TELK’ and in case, he is remanded to custody his

future will be spoiled.

5. On hearing both sides, I find that anticipatory bail can

be granted. Hence, the following order is passed:

(i) The petitioners shall surrender before the

Investigating officer within ten days from today and make

themselves available for interrogation and co-operate with the

investigation.

(ii) The petitioners shall, in the event of their arrest by

the police, be produced before the Magistrate court concerned,

in accordance with law.

(iii) On production of the accused before the Magistrate

court they shall be released on bail on their executing bond for

Rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum

to the satisfaction of the court below on condition that they will

appear before the Investigating officer as and when directed by

him and co-operate with the investigation.

The petition is allowed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE
csl