IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 28007 of 2007(H)
1. K.M.SUBODHKUMAR, S/O RAMAN,
... Petitioner
2. K.V.USHAKUMARI, AJANTHA,
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent
2. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,
3. DISTRICT OFFICER,
For Petitioner :SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI
Dated :20/09/2007
O R D E R
V.GIRI, J.
-------------------------
W.P.(C).No.28007 of 2007 H
-------------------------
Dated this the 20th day of September, 2007.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus
commanding respondents 2 and 3 to effect appointment
in the vacancies stated to have been reported, as
disclosed by Ext.P3 communication, in compliance with
Ext.P1 order. Ext.P1 order dated 15.1.2004 in W.P.(C)
No.1632/04 reads as follows:
“Standing counsel for P.S.C takes notice for the
second respondent. Urgent notice to other
respondents.
The concerned respondents will ensure that
posts of Lower Division Typists available at
Malappuram district are reported to the P.S.C in any
case, within a period of one month from today. In
respect of the reported vacancies, appointing
authorities should issue appointment orders without
delay.
Post for further orders on 1.3.04″
2. Essentially, the grievance of the petitioner
seems to be regarding the non-compliance of the
W.P.(C).No.28007 of 2007
:: 2 ::
directions contained in Ext.P1 by the appointing
authority. Obviously, the remedy of the petitioner, if
any, at this point of time, lies under the Contempt of
Courts Act, inasmuch as Ext.P1 order is concerned. A
fresh writ petition, in my opinion, in relation to the very
same question, is misconceived. Writ petition is
accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
(V.GIRI)
JUDGE
sk/
//true copy//
P.S. To Judge