High Court Kerala High Court

K.Mohanan vs The State Of Kerala on 13 December, 2007

Kerala High Court
K.Mohanan vs The State Of Kerala on 13 December, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 4460 of 2007()


1. K.MOHANAN, S/O KANNAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :13/12/2007

 O R D E R
                           V. RAMKUMAR , J
             ==========================
                  CRL.R.P. NO. 4460 of 2007
             ==========================
            Dated this the 13th day of December, 2007.

                                ORDER

The petitioner stand convicted concurrently by the courts

below for an offence punishable under Section 51(a) of the Kerala

Police Act and sentenced to imprisonment for 15 days and to pay

a fine of Rs.50 being the mandatory minimum.

2. The case of the prosecution as proved by the oral and

documentary evidence is as follows:

On 19.09.2001 at about 5.40 p.m. the revision petitioner

was found by the Head Constable of Police, Kannur Town Police

Station, near Sangeetha Talkies, Kannur under the influence of

the alcohol and unable to take care of himself and behaving in a

disorderly manner.

3. The credible evidence of PW1, the Head Constable

coupled with Ext.P1 drunkenness certificate clearly establishes

the offence alleged against the revision petitioner. His conviction

was confirmed in appeal by the lower appellate court. This court

sitting in revision will be loath to interfere with the said conviction

which is accordingly confirmed.

4. What now survives for consideration is the question as

to the legality or otherwise of the sentence imposed on the

revision petitioner. Even though what has been awarded to the

revision petitioner is only the mandatory minimum, the medical

records produced by the petitioner shows that he is a cardiac

patient who has to undergo a permanent pacemaker implantation

and an open heart surgery at Sri Jayadeva Institute of

Cardiology, Bangalore. Under these circumstances, I am inclined

to invoke proviso to Section 61(a). The sentence imposed on the

revision petitioner is accordingly set aside and instead, he is

sentenced to imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a

fine of Rs.200/- and on default to pay the fine, to suffer simple

imprisonment for 15 days. The fine amount shall be deposited

before the trial court within one month from today failing which

he shall suffer the default sentence. The revision petitioner shall

appear before the trial court on 15.01.2008 to receive sentence.

The revision is disposed of accordingly.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

rv