High Court Kerala High Court

K.Moosa vs State Of Kerala on 31 May, 2007

Kerala High Court
K.Moosa vs State Of Kerala on 31 May, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 12190 of 2007(A)


1. K.MOOSA, HSST JUNIOR (ARABIC),
                      ...  Petitioner
2. M.NASSARUDEEN, HSST JUNIOR (ARABIC),

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.S.KARTHIKA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :31/05/2007

 O R D E R
                              A.K.BASHEER, J.

                       -------------------------------------------

                         W.P.(C)No.12190 OF 2007

                       -------------------------------------------

                   Dated this the 31st day of May, 2007


                                  JUDGMENT

Petitioners are stated to be working as Higher Secondary

School Teachers (Junior) (Arabic) in Government schools at

Palakkad and Trivandrum respectively. As per order dated

March 23, 2007, a copy of which is on record as Ext.P6, the

Director of Higher Secondary Education held that petitioners

were liable to be reverted as High School Assistants to their

parent department with immediate effect. The above view was

taken on the basis of Ext.P5 order passed by the Director by

which seniority of the petitioners was reassigned. By such

reassignment, it become necessary that petitioners had to be

reverted.

2. It is the contention of the petitioners that no reversion

will be necessary since there are sufficient posts to accommodate

the petitioners as Higher Secondary teachers (Junior) at present.

Petitioners have pointed out certain vacancies in the writ

petition. It is their contention that going by their seniority they

can be accommodated. This is a matter to be looked into by the

department.

W.P.(C)No.12190 OF 2007

:: 2 ::

3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a

direction to respondent no.2 to consider the request if any that

may be made by them in writing within seven days from today.

Appropriate orders on the said request shall be passed by

respondent no.2 strictly on its merit and in accordance with law

as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from

the date of receipt thereof. It must be ensured by respondent

no.2 that apart from petitioners, all others who are likely to be

affected by the order that may be passed by him, are afforded

sufficient opportunity to be heard before any such decision is

taken. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the writ petition along

with a certified copy of the judgment before respondent no.2 for

compliance. Till such time, a decision is taken as directed above,

the interim order passed by this court shall remain in force.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE

jes