IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 4482 of 2010(I)
1. K.N.SASEENDRAN,
... Petitioner
2. SONI SASEENDRAN, S/O.SASEENDRAN,
3. PARPVATHY NANDAN, W/O.SONI SASEENDRAN,
Vs
1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
4. S.NANDAKUMAR,
5. LETHA NANDAKUMAR,
For Petitioner :SRI.K.R.VINOD
For Respondent :SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
Dated :01/03/2010
O R D E R
K. M. JOSEPH &
M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P(C). NO.4482 OF 2010 I
---------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st March, 2010
JUDGMENT
K.M. Joseph, J.
Petitioners 2 and 3 are husband and wife. The fourth
respondent is the father of the third petitioner. Fifth respondent
is her mother. It is their case that the third petitioner eloped with
the second petitioner. There is a Habeas Corpus Writ Petition
also filed by the father of the third petitioner. It is stated that
after the Judgment in the said Writ Petition, respondents 4 and 5
are making threat to the petitioners. Petitioners filed Ext.P2
complaint.
2. We heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 submits that
respondents 4 and 5 have no intention to do any harm to the life
of the petitioners. We record the submission and direct that
WPC.4482/2010 I 2
respondents 1 to 3 shall afford adequate protection for the life of
the petitioners against respondents 4 and 5 and their agents.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/=
K.M. JOSEPH,
JUDGE
Sd/=
M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS,
JUDGE
kbk.
// True Copy //
PS to Judge