K Nyathappa vs The Union Of India on 27 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
K Nyathappa vs The Union Of India on 27 July, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
ma: THE I-1¥C:H'. 301:??? :7? KARNATAKA, BANGALQRE
wcrm THIS THE 2?'??? my OF' JULY, 
BEFGRE W' '}.%

THE HGNBLE MR. JUs1f:§:E__ AJI_T".;'3    "

WRIT PETITIQN No 123332 :3? 20<f:'£; {G1f;r£~i}:*::?}:'-%%..__« 

BETW EEN

1

K NYATHAPPA

S/O LATE BYANEM
FREEDOM FiTHE§?'S _ 1 ,
R10 HOSUR VILLAGE:   
GOURIBIDVANUR T_L_AU_I{ v ._ ., 
KGLAR £)éTS'P._R1§)'M FIGHERS DI'VES§{)N,}

LCK BIAYAKA BHAVAN KHAFE MARKET,
 DELHI 1 100 03

"E{§ii?.BY ITS DEPUTY SECRETARY.

 'r;~£§: STATE 9;? KARNATAKA
' mp; BYE TS PRENCPAL SECRETARY

SEPT' PERSDNNEL AND
§iDi'v§INiST§A'E'IVE> REEFGRMS
SR AMBESKAR VEEEEBE 82§NGAL8ER 1'

 RESPQEQDENTS,

{By SEE ?§ARE3N{)RA PRASAQ5 HCGP FQR R12;



£"~J

Sn' i}.A. LAKSHMINARAYANA, CGS FGR R. 3)

TH§S WP FILED UNDER Am';(:LE;s 2:26 ANQ.1:¥;2fk*5"::T;§M.fHE;
CONSTETUTION, PRAYING TO DiREC"I' THE: R1, _*§_*c:}"::~:c::;rs:sI.::}i:::R,

REPRESENTATION AND RECQMMENDATIONS;.__"V!D.l§3 ' Aflfjf-C,.._V
D'I'.6.8.G5, VIBE ANN-D, 1)T.6.7.1991, AND_-%'yE'§P€}.§},"'~§D'F.A1.'?QG€y, 

RESPECFEVELY.  '

mREc:r '1'HE RESPONDENTS To" GRANT _ ;;L';;.1"'.s'UVc_:r§

MONETARY BENEFITS TO ‘Ij’I~§_E PE}T_i’£’iGNE}.i”5;AL0N€§;» wrm
;;*m:«:1″~z.1?:s*r FROM THE DATE, EEEHEN ” THE’ ‘SWA”I’A’F€ATRA’i’A
sgmx SAMMAN PENSION sc:H£”M}3~ CAME: ~1N’*m FCfiRC:E.

mazs PETITION <:::fQM1N:;5§; m.r§";~1EAR1i§G'i'N 'B' GRGUP
THIS BAY, THE CUURT Mama 'km; £'0L1.'gow–1r_~;c;: .

…..:,…..__._…_….x………'……… . -.

'Fh.§€: 13(ft£_;1{i£;';§1€1: be :3 fxeedom fighter. He tack part
in the: naiignal "z'ndepenée13ce and was a detenu

fmm ;5.9.19%:2,_:to-§.1é–,:§%»3 at Bangaiore Centrai Jaii. The

fifi;§fi§5;%,.A'ma;§¢ an 2ij§p'}i}:afiQn for fneedozsiz fighter pension tea the

tG{1':%:§&3If;:Iifl}iii~IT:tf_:.?eE7f1iCh has been granted, The: pairifiener also

I}:1a£:1f:__ 2i:1 a;1;:$}i§§_a£ion to the Central Government 2'._e., respondentwl

'fa: gram: §:§f:.pensio:1 under the Centra} Gnvemmeat Scheme. Thtz

'gfi:vaiice of the petiiismar i3 that avg}: as on tazriay the saifi

..__ 'ap§j1icat£0z1 for gm: of pension under 1:113 fientrai Gavemzmeni is

V Vm:)t consiééztfid, Hetnce, this writ pefifiicn?

2' It is mat disputed by the ieaxned Gcsvernmem: PI$jéd{é:"_:fh§t

the State Government has granted frttedom fighter

petitioner: The only request which is mad: in is *-1:.§)

direct the first i"€S§Z)0IT1d€':}f1f to ccnsider fix: ajjpiicétiefi for

af fmedom fighter };}€:I(1SiC)I1 u1fi:_ié;:.:.. thfi-._ :§}¢x;¢rrime1;.;. '

Scheme.

3. Hence, the following order b

Petition staztais first rfifipfifldfifli to

Cfilillfiidiii’ “;3{é’tififuer fer grant cf fmedom
fighter per1 §;.igf1 as? six monfins fmm the flats
Qf raceipt sf t1f;é<-rgfibpywgizifir.

Vighwanatlz, Ieaznetd HCGP is permittsd 1:9 file

fi)§3Iil§} €3fap§f:81’£iIiC¢ within fmzr wefiks.

Sd/-

JUDGE

age

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *