High Court Kerala High Court

K.P.Anil vs State Of Kerala Rep. By Sub … on 16 July, 2010

Kerala High Court
K.P.Anil vs State Of Kerala Rep. By Sub … on 16 July, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4005 of 2010()


1. K.P.ANIL,AGED 38 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.PRADEESH CHACKO

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :16/07/2010

 O R D E R
                                K.HEMA, J
                           -----------------------
                       B.A No.4005 OF 2010
                       --------------------------------
                Dated this the 16th day of July 2010

                                  ORDER

This petition is for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 452, 457, 294(b),

341, 323, 506(1) and 34 of IPC. According to prosecution, on

22/06/2010, at about 8:15 p.m, petitioner(A1), along with two

others committed house trespass into the house of de facto

complainant, who is a panchayat secretary, and wrongfully

restrained, criminally intimidated and assaulted him, using hands

and thereby committed various offences.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is

a member of CPI and he is working as a standing committee

Chairman of the Grama Panchayat. No incident as alleged had

taken place. De facto complainant called petitioner in his mobile

phone on several times, and he had gone to his house to ascertain

why he was called. But, a false case is foisted against him, only to

see that he did not take part in the election which was to be held

on 25/06/2010. Annexure A1 will show that an election was

scheduled on 25/06/2010.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the case diary

reveals that there was some altercation between de facto

complainant and petitioner, and de facto complainant was beaten

B.A No.4005 OF 2010 2

up at his house.

6. On hearing both sides, I do not think that there is any

ground to grant anticipatory bail. Petitioner has not made out

any exceptional circumstance which will persuade me to grant

anticipatory bail. Though his innocence is asserted, there are

no materials or circumstances to support the same.

Petition is dismissed.

K.HEMA
JUDGE

vdv