High Court Kerala High Court

K.P. Ashokan vs Joseph C. Chiramattel on 4 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
K.P. Ashokan vs Joseph C. Chiramattel on 4 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RP.No. 273 of 2004(D)


1. K.P. ASHOKAN, KANDATHINKARAYIL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. JOSEPH C. CHIRAMATTEL,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE PRESIDING OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.V.JOSEPH

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :04/12/2008

 O R D E R
                H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J.
              - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                              R.P. No. 273 OF 2004
                                           IN
                           W.A.No. 1185 OF 1998
                                          and
                        C.M. Appln. No. 657 OF 2004
              - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                 Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008

                                       ORDER

BASHEER, J.

The delay in filing the review petition is condoned.

(2) The review petitioner, who was the appellant in WA No. 1185

of 1998, seeks review of the judgment in the above appeal.

(3) The appeal was disposed of by the Division Bench recording

the submission of the employer/writ petitioner that he was prepared to

reinstate the review petitioner/appellant in service, if he furnishes a

written apology within a month from the date of the order.

(4) In the review petition it is averred that, the petitioner had in

fact sent Annexure A1 letter of apology by registered post on January 13,

2004. But, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that a sum of

Rs.10,102.50, which the employer was liable to pay him, has not been

paid to him so far. The petitioner contends that while disposing of the

appeal, the above aspect ought to have been kept in view.

Having perused the various grounds urged in the review petition,

R.P. No. 273 of 2004
in W.A. No. 1185 of 1998
-:2:-

we do not find any good ground to be considered in the review petition.

Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.

(H.L.DATTU)
CHIEF JUSTICE

(A.K.BASHEER)
JUDGE

ttb