IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 21479 of 2009(D)
1. K.P.HARIDAS, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
5. MACHINGAL BASHEER, S/O.LATE MACHINGAL
6. KONNALA YOUSUF, KONNALA HOUSE,
7. O.P.HUSSAIN, OTHUKKUPARA HOUSE,
8. HARIS AMIYAN, COUNCILLOR,
9. P.UBAIDULLAH, SECRETARY,
10. KODEN AZEEZ, KODEN HOUSE,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.)
For Respondent :SRI.K.A.JALEEL
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN
Dated :03/08/2009
O R D E R
P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C) NO. 21479 OF 2009
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
DATED THIS, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2009.
J U D G M E N T
Raman, J.
Petitioner’s grievance is that because of the alleged protest march
there is likelihood of his business being affected.
2. Learned Government Pleader submits that the protest march is
already over on 12.7.2009. According to the petitioner, the licence was
granted on 5.6.2009 and thereafter Respondents 5 to 10 and their henchmen
are constantly making troubles by conducting march to the Bar. The party
respondents 5 to 10 were served notice. Since notice was served by
Special Messenger, there is no justification for granting any further time to
them.
3. Heard both sides. So long as the petitioner is conducting his
business in accordance with law after obtaining valid licence, from the
authorities, there cannot be any obstruction for the ingress and egress to his
establishment. Police will, in such circumstances, give necessary
protection for preventing any obstruction being caused to the ingress and
WP(C) 21479/2009 2
egress if there is any other dispute between the parties, they can approach
the civil court or the appropriate forum.
The writ petition is closed.
P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE
P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE.
KNC/-