High Court Kerala High Court

K.P.Usman Aged 45 Years vs State Of Kerala on 30 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
K.P.Usman Aged 45 Years vs State Of Kerala on 30 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 532 of 2008()


1. K.P.USMAN AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.BAVA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.MOHAMMED

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :30/01/2008

 O R D E R
                               R.BASANT, J.

                            ----------------------

                             B.A.No.532 of 2008

                        ----------------------------------------

             Dated this  the  30th day of January  2008


                                   O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces

allegations for offences punishable inter alia under Section 379

I.P.C and the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development

and Regulation) Act. The crux of the allegations against the

petitioner is that a load of sand was transported in his lorry on

11/8/2006. Apprehending arrest, he had come to this court

earlier and his application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as

per order dated 22/09/2006 in B.A.No.5576/2006. The petitioner

has now been arrayed as an accused. He apprehends imminent

arrest. He then seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that it has now

been ascertained that the vehicle involved in the crime belongs

to the petitioner and he is the registered owner of the said

vehicle. State has no objection in granting anticipatory bail to

the petitioner; but appropriate conditions shall be imposed which

shall ensure proper and expeditious investigation of the case,

submits the learned Public Prosecutor.

B.A.No.532/08 2

3. I am satisfied that the petitioner can be granted

anticipatory bail. In the absence of opposition, it is not

necessary for me to advert to facts in any greater detail.

4. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the

petitioner.

i) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 06/02/2008. He

shall be released on regular bail on condition that he executes a

bond for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two

solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m

and 3 p.m on 07/02/2008. During this period, the investigating

officer shall be at liberty to interrogate the petitioner in custody

and take all necessary steps for the proper conduct of the

investigation in this crime. Thereafter the petitioner shall so

appear as and when directed by the investigating officer in

writing to do so.

B.A.No.532/08 3

(iii) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law,

as if these directions were not issued at all.

(iv) If he were arrested prior to 06/02/2008, he shall be

released from custody on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees twenty five thousand only) without any sureties,

undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on

06/02/2008.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr

B.A.No.532/08 4

B.A.No.532/08 5

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007