IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RP.No. 189 of 2009(E)
1. K. POCKER, S/O. KUNHIKUTTY ALI HAJI,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL
... Respondent
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
3. M.K. KARTHIKEYAN,
4. SHRI. P.K. RADHAKRISHNAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI
Dated :04/03/2009
O R D E R
V.GIRI, J.
-------------------------
R.P.No.189 of 2009
in W.P.(C).No.34691 of 2004
-------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009.
O R D E R
I do not find any grounds to review the judgment by which
the writ petition was allowed at the instance of the petitioner
himself.
2. Mr.P.B.Krishnan, learned counsel for the review
petitioner points out that the respondents have understood the
judgment in such a manner that the judgment has not resulted in
any benefit derived by the petitioner as such. This is possibly
resultant upon a wrong understanding of the judgment. I do not
think that these are matters which will afford any justification for
review of the judgment.
In the circumstances, the review petition is dismissed; but
without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take appropriate
action challenging Annexure A or institute other proceedings as is
deemed fit and advised.
Sd/-
(V.GIRI)
JUDGE
sk/
//true copy//
P.S. to Judge