High Court Kerala High Court

K.Prabhakara Kurup vs P.Soumini on 16 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
K.Prabhakara Kurup vs P.Soumini on 16 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1697 of 2007()


1. K.PRABHAKARA KURUP, S/O UNNIKRISHNAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. P.SOUMINI, W/O P.VELAYUDHAN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. P.K.VINOD, S/O VELAYUDHAN,

3. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :16/10/2008

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
             = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                M.A.C.A. NO. 1697 OF 2007
            = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
       Dated this the 16th day of October, 2008.

                      J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode in O.P.(MV)2559/99.

The claimant, a 53 year old headmaster sustained injuries in

a road accident and the Tribunal has awarded a

compensation of Rs.5,000/-. Dissatisfied with the amount,

the claimant has come in appeal for enhancement.

2. Heard the counsel for all. The learned Tribunal did

not accept the factum of the fracture of clavicle on the

ground that it is not mentioned in the wound certificate. It

also did not give due weight regarding the C.T.Scan taken.

So it awarded a global amount of Rs.5,000/-. Learned

counsel for the appellant had made available before me the

documents produced before the Court. It can be seen that

even at the time of admission there was a complaint

regarding the pain on the shoulder. There was a contusion

on the frontal region and the C.T.Scan revealed no trauma

M.A.C.A. NO. 1697 OF 2007
-:2:-

related to intra cranial pathology. Treatment certificate

would reveal that he was treated as an inpatient in the

hospital from 1.10.99 to 5.10.99. The Tribunal itself has

stated that Ext.A5 series of medical bills will come to

Rs.1,301/-. I feel the compensation awarded is inadequate

when compared to the injury sustained and therefore I refix

the compensation as follows.

3. Towards medical expenses I grant Rs.2,000/-,

towards bystanders, extra nourishment and treatment

expenses I allow a sum of Rs.800/-, towards pain and

sufferings I award a sum of Rs.6,000/- and I award a further

sum of Rs.3,000/- towards loss of amenities and enjoyment

in life. I am not awarding any amount for actual loss of

earnings in the absence of any particulars to prove the same.

Therefore the claimant will be entitled to a total

compensation of Rs.11,800/- out of which Rs.5,000/- has

already been awarded. Thus the claimant will be entitled to

an additional compensation of Rs.6,800/-.

M.A.C.A. NO. 1697 OF 2007
-:3:-

In the result the MACA is partly allowed and the

claimant is awarded an additional compensation of

Rs.6,800/- with 6% interest on the said sum from the date of

petition till realisation and the insurance company is directed

to deposit the same within a period of sixty days from the

date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-