High Court Kerala High Court

K.R.Sasikumar vs P.V.C.Chit Funds on 16 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
K.R.Sasikumar vs P.V.C.Chit Funds on 16 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7833 of 2009(O)


1. K.R.SASIKUMAR,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. K.AMMINIKKUTTY, W/O. SASIKUMAR,

                        Vs



1. P.V.C.CHIT FUNDS,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN

 Dated :16/12/2009

 O R D E R
                   S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
                  -----------------------------------
                   W.P.(C).No.7833 of 2009 - O
                   ---------------------------------
            Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

Petitioners are the judgment debtors in E.P.No.20 of 2007

in O.S.No.422 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Kottayam.

Decree executed is one passed for recovery of money based on a

chitty prized, and, the respondent is the decree holder. In

execution of the decree an immovable property belonging to the

2nd judgment debtor after attachment complying with the

formalities has been proceeded for sale. At that stage,

petitioners/judgment debtors have filed the above writ petition

impeaching the steps taken for sale or the property.

2. Notice being given, respondent/decree holder has

entered appearance. I heard the counsel on both sides.

3. Pursuant to orders passed by this Court from time to

time, petitioners/judgment debtors have deposited till date a sum

of Rs.2 Lakhs towards the decree debt. The outstanding liability

now, after such payment, it is submitted, is approximately

around Rs.2 Lakhs. The only plea canvassed by the learned

W.P.(C).No.7833 of 2009 – O

2

counsel for the petitioners/judgment debtors at the time of

hearing is indulgence of this Court for discharging the balance

decree debt due by instalment payments. Learned counsel for

the respondent has no objection in extending the benefit of

instalment payment subject to fixation of reasonable sum as

instalments by this Court.

4. Having regard to the outstanding liability due on the

decree debt, I find that rate of instalment of Rs.20,000/- per

month for a period of 10 months would be reasonable and

appropriate. Petitioners/judgment debtors are granted

permission to discharge the decree debt by 10 equal monthly

instalments of Rs.20,000/- with such payments to commence

from the month of January, 2010 onwards. The instalment

payment as directed shall be deposited in court or paid at the

office of the respondent and receipt collected on or before 15th of

every month. In case 15th happens to be a holiday, such

deposit/payment shall be made on the next working day itself.

In the event of default in payment of even one instalment, the

decree holder will be at liberty to proceed for realisation of the

W.P.(C).No.7833 of 2009 – O

3

balance decree debt in lump discarding the instalment facility

extended by this Court. Whatever outstanding amount due after

payment of th 9th instalment shall be cleared in the 10th

instalment irrespective of rate of instalment of Rs.20,000/- fixed

as above. Petitioners/judgment debtors have to make payment

for the month of April as well during the period of mid summer

vacation of the courts on or before the date fixed at the office of

the respondent and collect receipt of such payment. Court below

is directed to close the execution petition in the light of the

orders/directions given above, but, such petition shall be revived

in case there is default in complying with the instalment facility

extended, if so applied for by the decree holder.

Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is

closed.

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,
JUDGE.

bkn/-