High Court Kerala High Court

K.Radhamany Amma vs The Director Of Urban Affairs on 10 February, 2011

Kerala High Court
K.Radhamany Amma vs The Director Of Urban Affairs on 10 February, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 29060 of 2010(F)


1. K.RADHAMANY AMMA, AGED 56,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. TIRUR MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY

3. ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY,

4. THE CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED

5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY

                For Petitioner  :SMT.C.K.SHERIN

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :10/02/2011

 O R D E R
                            S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
                      ==================
                       W.P.(C).No. 29060 of 2010
                      ==================
              Dated this the 10th day of February, 2011
                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, who has retired on 31.3.2010 from the service of

the 2nd respondent-Municipality, has filed this writ petition complaining

of delay in disbursal of pension, arrears of pension, DCRG, provident

fund amount, commuted value of pension and arrears of dearness

allowance. Originally, the 2nd respondent took the stand that the 1st

respondent has to sanction the retirement benefits of the petitioner.

Therefore, I directed the learned Government Pleader to get

instructions on the same.

2. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner has produced

before me an order passed by the 1st respondent, wherein the

retirement benefits of the petitioner have been sanctioned. The

learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent seeks two months’

time to disburse the retirement benefits due to the petitioner.

3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with

a direction to the 2nd respondent to disburse the terminal benefits due

to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two

months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

sdk+                                             S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
          ///True copy///


                              P.A. to Judge

2