High Court Kerala High Court

K.Ramadasan vs The Superintendent Of Police on 22 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
K.Ramadasan vs The Superintendent Of Police on 22 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 12028 of 2009(Q)


1. K.RAMADASAN, 'KALABHAM',
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SHYLAJA RAMADASAN, 'KALABHAM',

                        Vs



1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.JAYASURYA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :22/05/2009

 O R D E R
            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.
          ===========================
          W.P.(C).No.12028    OF 2009
          ===========================

      Dated this the 22nd day of May,2009

                   JUDGMENT

Petitioners are claiming to be the owners

of building bearing T.C. 28/627 by name Ram

Towers at Punnapuram, Pettah,

Thiruvananthapuram and T.C.28/627(7) rented out

to Sabarinath the main accused in CBCID Crime

No.169/CR/TVPM/08. That case was registered

under sections 120B, 406, 409, 420, 202, 212

and 34 IPC. Consequent to the registration of

the case Dy.SP sealed the building. Ext.P3

petition was submitted before the

Superintendent of Police, CBCID,

Thiruvananthapuram to release the building to

the petitioners claiming that they are the

owners of the building. On the failure to

release the building, this petition is filed

under Article 226 of Constitution of India for

W.P.(C)12028/ /2009 2

a writ of mandamus or direction to the first

respondent Superintendent of Police, CBCID,

Thiruvananthapuram to release the vacant premises

to the petitioners and to produce the material

objects kept in the premises before court.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor were

heard.

3. Admittedly the buildings sought to be

released are rented out to Sabarinath the main

accused in CBCID Crime 169/CR.TVPM/08. The fact

that during the investigation of that case the

Investigating Officer sealed the buildings will

not enable petitioners, even if they are the

landlords, to get vacant possession of the

buildings. So long as the tenancy continues,

landlord cannot claim vacant possession of the

building. The remedy of the petitioners to get

vacant possession of the buildings is to approach

the Rent Control Court and not to file a petition

W.P.(C)12028/ /2009 3

of this nature.

Writ Petition is dismissed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
tpl/-

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.

———————

W.P.(C).NO. /06

———————

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER,2006