IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 26307 of 2007(F)
1. K. RAMANKUTTY NAIR,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE PANJAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
... Respondent
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR.
3. K. UNNIKRISHNAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.SIBY MATHEW
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Dated :05/09/2007
O R D E R
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.
..........................................................
W.P.(C)No.26307 OF 2007
...........................................................
DATED THIS THE 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2007
J U D G M E N T
Heard the submissions of Sri.Philip J.Vettickattu, counsel for the
petitioner and those of Sri.K.J.Mohammed Ansar, Government Pleader
who has taken notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.
2. I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. But,
according to me, even without issuing notice to the 1st respondent-
Panchayat or to the 3rd respondent, the affected party, this Writ
Petition can be disposed of at this stage itself issuing the following
directions:-
The 2nd respondent-District Collector will take up Ext.P6
representation, issue notice to the 3rd respondent and also to the 1st
respondent-Panchayat, hear the petitioner, the Panchayat and the 3rd
respondent and dispose of Ext.P6 at the earliest and at any rate within
two months of receiving copy of this judgment.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)
tgl