High Court Kerala High Court

K.Ratnakaran vs The Regional Transport Authority on 19 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
K.Ratnakaran vs The Regional Transport Authority on 19 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 30963 of 2009(M)


1. K.RATNAKARAN, S/O. K KUNHIRAMAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :19/03/2010

 O R D E R
                     K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J
                      ...........................................
                    WP(C).NO.30963                   OF 2009
                      ............................................
        DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2010

                                 JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the holder of a driving license with

No.2186/76 and Badge No.894/76 issued by the licensing authority,

Kozhikode, applied for the grant of an autorickshaw permit, on the

ground that he intended to purchase an autorickshaw. He wanted to ply

the autorickshaw for the purpose of earning a livelihood for himself

and his family. He alleges that there are a number of vacancies

available in Kozhikode City for parking autorickshaws and therefore if

his application was considered on the merits and granted, he would be

able to earn a decent livelihood. However, though he had submitted

Ext.P1 application, his complaint is that no orders have been passed

thereon by the authorities. He therefore seeks appropriate directions for

an early disposal of Ext.P1. The Government Pleader submits that

Ext.P1 application would be considered on the merits, though there are

no vacancies for the allotment of a permit as sought for by the

petitioner in Kozhikode City.

Wpc 30963/2009 2

2. If there are no vacancies in the City, the authorities could have

rejected the application of the petitioner, which has also not been done

in the present case.

3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of

directing the first respondent to consider the application of the

petitioner for the issue of a regular autorickshaw permit, evidenced

herein by Ext.P1, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders

thereon, as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within a period of

two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE

lgk