K S Chathur vs K R Nithin on 23 January, 2009

K rém   ,  

w P No_.__14987l2008

I

IN 'THE HIGH Comm' 0? KARNATAKA AT BA§I1§}A:;s:§':%fi *  'A  

DATED '1':-us THE 231*» DAY:0$¥' Jnwtéiany'   -  A  
BEFORE    'T    
THE Hoxrnm DR. K, 
WRIT PETYFION yo. 1g-9&1  (cwcpcgi

BETVVEEN:

KSChathur,    i " ,  %  % 

3/0 KS11€3-a1'S}38I1,s'' '       

Age: 21 years, ' 511  'V ' ..   .

Student, V   . 

R/0 Jain Temple ';.;:__ V .,

Kadur Taluk. ._ --     ' ' Petitioner

(By Sxi G  ;"'£'<'V3§i'V.pctit:ionc1')

Alb:

Sf?  V.  . ,
Age:j"~2'?;yaa1*s," 'V  - . . 

  R/0 J'ain='i*cmp1¢:--R¢;ad,
  T313315' 

.1  at  367, I 1*' Cmss,
 Qflfiihfiajxgg J P Hagar,

 Phase,

. 'V:  Respondent

W P 1″«T_4t.!r..}.V_4§_:8″.’+”!.’_20’i}8

3

and « separate possession. The plaint ccmtains via; ‘ j

propcrtics. If the case of the

schedule furnished by the msponécfxqplainag ‘ hek’

could have given bo1mdarics__ ~.to* such
circumstances, question of direction to
the respondent to assessment
number does not rightly mjecmd the

application. is

4. In thxé’ gtsgllt,’ fiails and the same: is hexeby

sd/4.__
Judge