IN me man counr OF KARN-ATAKA AT 8A_N§fi§.QRE saves: Ti-ES me 29"' my OF Jua.x§%;%2¢:;ég % BEFORE A L THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE "§"v>HI'ti'g.I_fiA!':l:l!\IAVC-'}¥:i§i..'V:VIA,*.:a;€.I_2x L BETWEEN : K.Safish Kumar ' _ $ % é Aged 5:1 yr-;21;*3f_ = . Managifig [§ir¢:cto1* of V ' M] s,_S};1a]:i13i' &._HQtfl1$ V M[:s.Cei¢3t§aI Wfgarchduéilig Ltd., No.13/_2--, Soiztb_vF*ark'~R£>ad' - Nehru Nagar " BaflE83.GTe'20V"' .. PETITIONER gay' 3;-1 M;s;x§j§nd:4a Prasad, Sr. Counsel) % f @ Roopa ' A W/o.H.'E3;j_£«dkcsh 3G.years R] at.i§o.24~'7 ' AA _Ho0(li'Vil}agc V V K.R.Purm Hobli ' East'I'a1u1<: .. RESPONDENT
(By Sr: N.K.Gupta, Adv.,)
.2.
This CILP. is filed under Secticm 482 (sf Cr.P.C. by the
advocate for the petitioner praying that this Hoxfblc Coin’!
may be pleased to set, aside th¢ order dated 16. 10.20536
passed in cc:.No.2945o/2006 on the file of the xxvH_AcM–Ni», “-
Bangalore, and conseqlmntly quash the j _
CC.No. 2946012006 011 the file of the XIV ACMM, M_ayo=Hsn}1A, =
Iaangalore. _– ”
This C’.rI.P. coming 011 fer ad;miss}i0§gi?, ; A’
Court made the following:–
Based on the respcmdent
herein, _(2V(1’1.No.29460/2006 are
initiated aga’ : L an’ st befere the com-t below,
_ far ofifendé “»p§;fiisfié1bie under Section 138 91′ the
{for short hereinafter referred to as the
2. records disclose. that the petitioner herein
Cheques, out of them two chequss are for
‘VéRs,_i§3,(}O,000/– and another cheque for Rs.20,00,000/~,
3911 dated 272.20%. Those cheques were issued by the
V2’
.3.
accused as surety and induced the eomplainai1t.p_:’€e
withdraw the suit in O.S.No.1333/2004;”:—-
partit;ien). The accused 11:1ade~~t.’3.e& ‘
believe that the value of the moibetyiilef _
complainant would he -_ 6 ” V
sites each measuring a.
equivalent to 1/ 1251 sha reJ subject matter
of O.S.No.1333′,Z.20O4;;’_A the cheques
were E ‘”insufi’1eient funds”.
Thereafter, . issued by the complainant.
Accused’ Ilet said notice. Hence, the
coIa._1g§lah*3t is efzder Section 138 of the Act against
A’; .t1*xe. ‘ ~~,
prima facie disclose that the
V V’ _ has completed statutory formalities before
. .. , ., C0mp)aint It is brought to the notice of the
that the evidence of the complainant is also
and some of the documents are marked. The
V’
,. 4 ..
complainant is to be cross~–exa.mined by the accyj-ifi. At
that stage, the present petition is filed.
Since the prima facie material is against *
accused and since the trial
not a fit case to quash the 1 A’
Hence, petition is <;§sé1vation$*.
made during the for the
purpose of dfii_sp-osalw ‘fi1ey should not
the matter. All
the contenfioriés — urged before the
Sd/-mi
Iudgé