IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA.No. 1848 of 2007()
1. K.SETHUMADHAVAN, S/O. APPUTTY,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. CALICUT CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.,
... Respondent
2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER,
3. THE UNION OF INDIA,
4. K.JANAKI AMMA, D/O. SREEDHARAN NAIR,
5. K.MOHANDAS,
For Petitioner :SRI.SAKIR.K.H.
For Respondent :SRI. AJITH KRISHNAN, ADDL.CGSC
The Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice MR.J.B.KOSHY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN
Dated :10/02/2009
O R D E R
J.B.KOSHY, Ag.CJ & P.BHAVADASAN, J.
===========================
W.A.No.1848 of 2007 - E
===============================
Dated this the 10th day of February, 2009.
J U D G M E N T
Koshy, Ag.CJ.
Appellant/petitioner is challenging the proceedings under
the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Learned Single
Judge found that the writ petitioner has an alternate remedy
under Section 17 of the Act. We see no ground to interfere in the
above. However, since the writ appeal was admitted and pending
for long time, we cannot non-suit the appellant without any
remedy available. We also note that there was no sitting of the
DRT at Cochin for a long time. If the appellant files an
application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act within a period
of three weeks from today, it should be considered by the
Tribunal on merit. With that modification, we dispose of this writ
appeal.
J.B.KOSHY,
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.
P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE.
bkn/-