High Court Kerala High Court

K.T.Joseph vs State Of Kerala on 16 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
K.T.Joseph vs State Of Kerala on 16 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 5250 of 2009()


1. K.T.JOSEPH, S/O.KURIAKOSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.JAJU BABU

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :16/10/2009

 O R D E R
                          K.T.SANKARAN, J.
             ------------------------------------------------------
                       B.A. NO. 5250 OF 2009
             ------------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 16th day of October, 2009


                                O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in

Crime No.131 of 2009 of Vellarikundu Police Station, Kasaragod

District.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section

5 of the Explosive Substances Act.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

5.10.2009, the following order was passed:

After having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, I am of

the view that before disposing of the Bail Application,

an opportunity should be given to the petitioner to

appear before the investigating officer. Accordingly,

there will be a direction to the petitioner to appear

before the investigating officer at 9 AM on 12th and 13th

October, 2009.

B.A. NO. 5250 OF 2009

:: 2 ::

Post on 16.10.2009.

It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that

the petitioner will not be arrested until further orders in

connection with Crime No.131 of 2009 of Vellarikundu

Police Station, Kasaragod.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

as the learned Public Prosecutor that the direction in the order dated

5.10.2009 has been complied with by the petitioner.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and also taking note of the fact that

the direction in the order dated 5.10.2009 has been complied with by

the petitioner, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted

to the petitioner. There will be a direction that in the event of the

arrest of the petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall

release him on bail on his executing bond for Rs.15,000/- with two

solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer

concerned, subject to the following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall report before the investigating
officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on alternate
Mondays, till the final report is filed or until further
orders;

B.A. NO. 5250 OF 2009

:: 3 ::

b) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating
officer for interrogation as and when required;

c) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution
witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

d) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in
any prejudicial activity while on bail;

e) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned
above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

ahz/