K T Thippeswamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 November, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 2 13" DAY OF' NOVEMBER 

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE H.B11J.A:*?f'A% j'     

WRIT EITLON NO. 144o5Lz%9;§S;_Q§_1°g2;;'  '&  j» * ~ 7

BETWEEN :

1 K *1' THIPPESWAMY .
s/0 K'I'I~IIPPESWfi--M"1'_   V  
AGED ABOU'1'4~4YEARS    ~

ACCOUNTANT  % V

BASANNA  _ V

S/O SIDDAIAH.   
AGED Aaou'r"5o~YEARsx' .. 
coox % H *V'.*."

%y%Gz*RUrsii%RT%f%ivTV '   %%%%% % .
'3/o.~Y.ERAPI=A_ 

AEEEIZ} ABOUT'  YEARS
 .   

 '8-OWBHAG¥?AM,MiA

M  4310 THIFEPEEEUDRAPPA
" ~ V' Asap Tmom' 50 YEARS
'* CQOK".

*  P!-ZEMMAKKA
T "S!Q__YELL.ACHARI
 "AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
~-Ass1s'mN'r coax

la/,



5 HANUMAKKA
w/0 BASANNA
AGE!) ABOUT 45 YEARS
Assrsmrrr COOK

7 ommn 
3/0 KADAIAH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
WATCHMAN  

ALL ARE RESIDENTS 0}?

(3/0 HMTFG COLLEGE .

SC/ST HOSTEL, 

NAYAKANAHATTE,

CHALLAKERE TALUK, _ . '   _ 
CHFPRADURGA ~57?   -  "  1  PE'rrrIONERs

(By an: A C  mvé»   1    

"I?

THE "STATE 01?" KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS VSECREFARY
. . fro c.oVER.N_MEN1'

!_f's(::<:.1AL WELF:'-é-RE DEPARTMENT

A « KGMS BEHLDING

- A ~3A1s:.'I'}~§. moon, M s BUIDLING

 AA  BANGALORE 550 001

   Erna DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER

CHITRADURGA D131' RIC?
CHITRADURGA

5/



4 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ZILLA PANCHAYAT
CHYTRADURGA DISTRICT
CHITRADURGA

(R-4 DELETED VIDE COURT
ORDER DATED 2 1- 1 1-2008)

5 PRINCIPAL  " % A
H M 1' FIRST GRADE COLLEGE  
NAYAKANAHATTE %   t
CHALLEKERE TALUK 1 A V ..  
CHITRADURGA D1srR:3)  if  x 
(SR1. R-*1 T0 R-3)

THIS' _w.:=>, A 13.. m.E1)'U/A.2% & 227 0? THE
congrmirxon QFAIHD§;5," VPRAYING T0 DiREC!' THE
RESPONDEN'.'IV'Sv.TO-_PAY'MINIMUM WAGES AND OTHER
ALLOWANCES Ann' CCJNTINUE TO PAY THE SAME BY

 fiE)c'1*_EM)1_N1:sT;«.26.9.2oo6, MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND 3.,
Rsspfictmrsmt AND WHICH ORDER HAS BEEN

1:u:1éLEMErm?:1::T;;"BY THE REPONDEMS 1 TO 4, AS PER
ORDER j,24.3.mo7 MARKED as ANNEXURE-L AND

- GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS TI-HS HOWBLE COURT
 "DEEMS _F1'i=*r IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE ANB
% ' «ALLOW " THE ABOVE WRIT PETFPION WITH ALL
 "-mN$:3QUENT1AL BENEFITS mcwmrm ARREARS or

   MINIMUM wacms AND ALSO INTEREST THEREON.

This Writ Petition coming on for 

u  hearing this day, the Court made the fofiowing:

b/



ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the

also the learned Government Pleader.

2. In this writ petition

227 of the Constitution of tiic.__ ” V

sought for writ of ‘iespenderxts
to pay the the other

allowances by this Court

in w.r7.N§. 1759 \iv;P.No.43574/2004 vide

Axmexuxree-‘BV’ ‘V ~ .. ,. ” é .

frm s “–V(.3Q1_1rt in w.P.No.43574/2004 and

has directed the respondents to

pay? wages with efiect from 1-9-2003 and

_ benefits.

V’ Therefore, the writ petitian is aliewed and

” respondents 1 to 3 are directed to pay the

V ” V wages and aiao the consequential benefits to the

4./

petitioners, Within six weeks from the date of ”

a copy of this order, in terms of the order ‘

Court in W.P.No.43674/2004 and 14Vf1i*.}15Io._1*z59L1;,1§ie~i:;,f15}fT

_ . mdg€e

Bss.