IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN: AND: _ KUDUR TALUK DATED THIS THE 16*" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAWAD_.R.Al;j1»!\3V:»A./,::' C CRL.R.P. No. 828 OF 2009 K VARADARAJ S/O KRISHNA I AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS -. T' R/AT. RAILWAY CON_TRA--;cTOR ~ BHADRA COLONY BHA'DRA\JATHI'T'._ _ SHIMOGA O1STRIcT.._;. T, , . PETITIONER (BY MR? NAGA'RAI I ; SXQ KEMP_A.i~..fH_ MAJOR, _ WORKING AT 'BHEL,__ " R/O B"EI_LAR¥._CAMR_BIRUR RESPONDENT **>i< ""RSTHSISu'TI__CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED _ U/S3397!' HPETITEONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT, CONVICTION AND SEONT-'ENCE DATED 7.8.2006 PASSED IN C.C.NO.1384/2001 BY THE PRL.JMFC,KADUR AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE .._3UDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 25.8.2009 PASSED IN 'R/"W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE [Q CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.103/2006 BY THE FAST TRACK COURT, CHIKKAMAGALUR. THIS PETITION Is COMING ON FOR ADMIS§ICV):'Ex::.f'5i*_t§'IvS DAY THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING'.- ORDER
The matter is listed for adnjiis-sViOn.CA”._’i’he
counsel Mr. Shankar.D. appea’r../:f’O..r. the” re.spOn’de’IIt””a’nd hast
also filed vakalath. It,i’s~,taken'”‘onVs_;i’eco.r.d. Bo’t*h parties are
present.
2. Bath an ajtdpplicétaon under Section 147
of the N_egOt!,at;!e,;_:1nsi:ru.nfie’rits_”Act:; V(Cin short ‘the N.I. Act’)
reporting ._setti-‘efimenit’uiietween the parties and seek
permissionto ‘offence.
“*._V.A4;./3.,/._:’Considering the nature of proceedings and the
tern’-35 agreetd upon, I am satisfied that the circumstances
“are__ made out for grant of permission and accordingty
“‘pe’rinission is granted. The offence punishable under
-~-Section 3.38 of the N.I. Act is compounded. As envisaged
under sub-Section (8) of Section 320 Cr.P.C., it shali have
the effect of acquittal of the accused. The ampfitite. in
deposit, if any, is permitted to be withdra\;v’r’1~«’..’bti__:’\theV~.
Complainant.
5. In these terms the revis’iQn:1′.i_A$”dis;§e<§Aed'_of;
UDGE
\/K