K. Vasudean Nair S/O Late Krishnan … vs The Deputy General Manager (C & S) on 26 August, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE

DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF AI3GUST.2_i'3  V.

BEFORE  .  
TEE I~ION'BLE MR..ms1'1CE   RE1")"DY. 

W.P. NO.17438/20:10 [$4RESy  
BETWEEN: *   

K. VASUDEAN NAIR S/O LATEOER1_sHNAN'_NAIR 

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS  .-- _   

DEPT/PB N0.1575/6'3__1'2.3~7'2 V V 

WORKING As sTENOGRAFHE_R%-A.

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTIOSV LTD: . _ _ 

AIRCRAFT DIVISIVON, :VIMAN,A:9UfRA POST,

BANGALORE:~5GOVL»Vi3171 ::   A ' 

R /AT NO.2_1V&..222j;jH_E_--fwAwA, VIGNANA NAGAR

13TH OROS-s, NEW 'fHIP'EiASfi.N,DR;3 'POST

BANGA:,ORE¢56'G.,O75_,  * 
 O'  if "ff   "  PETITIONER

(By Srivvi' _z{vAs1JDE'v.A g~PARTY--1N«PERsON))

  V" TEE OEEUTY GENERAL MANAGER {C 3: s)

Ev.» V

" .&~p1sO1Pi..INARY AUTHORITY
 HINDUSTI'-AN AERONAUTICS LIMITED
. '"=AIRCRAF'F DIVISION
 BA.NGA};;ORE COMPLEX. VIMANAPURA. P0
BA;15IGALORE«56O 017

' ._THE GENERAL MANAGER

= ._ EINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED

AIRCRAFT DIVISION

BANGALORE COMPLEX, VINLANAPURA
PO. BANGALORE-560 O17

 RESPONDENTS

M

and not invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction under

Articles 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. The petitioner has an alternative and efficacious

remedy to ventilate his grievance and henc_e.,._;doesijn”et

call for interference with the order V’

otherwise, the equitabie doctrine’ idelay’ d;efeai€.s Vve'(§ui.t”y

applies on all its fours to the factsof case,”

petition is filed on 3.1.201O”vca’iV!ing order’

dated 31.1.2_.”()i(§§::l:.afteir a;l’a:pse Aof–i”six…3rears. the petition

suffers from.::ino.rdinat’e§.’jdelay aijlcii latches. Hence. the

sdl-it
Eudqe

petitio”ri”is’