Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Kalliani Kutty vs The District Collector on 29 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 1739 of 2010(N)


1. KALLIANI KUTTY,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. RAJESH KUMAR, S/O.KALLIANI KUTTY,

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL),

3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

4. JAYARAJAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :29/01/2010

 O R D E R
               P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                         WP(C) No. 1739 of 2010
                      ---------------------------------------
               Dated, this the 29th day of January, 2010


                              J U D G M E N T

The grievance of the petitioner is against the attempt to draw

electric line through the property of the petitioner, contrary to the actual

facts, figures and relevant provisions of law, also ignoring the

proceedings pending consideration before the Munsiff’s Court,

Thaliparamba, in O.S.370/2009.

2. When the matter had come up for consideration before this

Court on 19.01.2010, ‘status quo’ as on date was ordered.

3. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the first

respondent submits that the matter which was pending consideration

before the first respondent has already been finalized and the order

passed by the first respondent has been forwarded to the petitioner.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner might

be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the

order stated as passed by the first respondent and so as to enable to

pursue such exercise, the position as on date might be ordered to be

continued for a reasonable period.

3. After hearing both the sides, including the learned standing

WP(C) No.1739/2010
2

counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent, permission sought for is granted

and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn; however making it clear

that ‘status quo’ ordered by this Court on 19.01.2010 will continue for a

further period of two weeks.

P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE
dnc


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

23 queries in 0.601 seconds.