IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22"" DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010f, BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPAL';?$_:"GQWVL§'A O" WRIT PETITION NO.18338/V2010 BETWEEN: NARAYANA NAEKA DEAD BY LR.S 1 KAMALA _ V' W/O.LATE NARAvANA.__NA1:<A ' AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.' V NO.l~5, MUNDAJE HOUSE * BALNADU VILLAGE &~PQST ' - PUTTUR _, D.:L_JTTUR TALUK, .D.+<,DISTR1cT. A' ' DTNESHA S/O.LATE NARAYANA NAIKA ' AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS NO.1*S MUNDAJE HOUSE, [\.) BALNADU VILLAGE AND POST PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT. 3 LATHA D/O.LATE NARAYANA NAIKA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS NO.1--5 MUNDAIE HOUSE, H BALNADU VILLAGE AND POST) " ' PUTTUR TALUK, D. KDISTRICT. * - . I I _ .. .E?rTAITvI_0NE;RS' (BY SR1GRAVISHANKARSHASTR':f_FORV' . '- SRI GBALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, 'A.D_\I's,) AND: KOGGU NAIK -- _ . S/O.LATE KITTU NAIK * AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/O.MUNDA3'E--.fjfOi;:'SE . ' _ ' BALAND VIL:.'LAG_E, 'RLn.fTuR,j0TfALu__I<',i_ D.:<.DIsTRIcT. ' ._ " _ -- RESPONDENT
(BY sRI…AB.v.’KRIsNN-;A,TADv.,I)”‘—- _ ‘
THIs_wRIT”‘RETIT-ION Is FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND .227 OF VT’HE.’–cOvNs’I’uTuTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASHV THE ORDER DATED 02.06.2010 ON IA NO III IN
EXELCUTI.ON..Y’CASE F\iC’.'”O7.2005 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE
‘(S«R.’ DNT8; _AD_DITIONAL C J M, PUTTUR, D.K. CERTIFIED COPY
IOF’W.HI’CH”I»S»PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A AND CONSEQUENTLY
‘—IAn.NO’CII-I I13-,|;i-_.O’WED AS PRAYED FOR.
THISRETHITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
I . THIS’ DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
QRDER
Respondent / decree holder has instituted E.P. 7/05
‘s
E
-‘-against the petitioners / legal representigves of the
/if
judgment debtor. The petitioners filed I.A.3 in E.P. 7/05 to
stay further proceedings tili adjudication of
pending on the file of the Pri. Civil 3udge
Puttur. The decree hoider opposed
The Court being convinced that the .reigifefu’-p.r:ayed”i~h:….1.A;V3é
cannot be granted, has dismi_ssed'”the sarnefiv.This_:§wVrit.:’:i»
petition is directed against theivisaid oggrdeiz”
2. Indisputedi’y_,,.V:.” _the ;pue”t.ijtio>ner_s have filed
0.5.66/O6 wherein thwiaeqe so.u’g_h”t..for;Tcanceilation of the
judgment 4.a§i’id .2u’3′;’iV’1.01 passed in
O.S.51.,”2*Ov0.C5;”i;n tiayouf-‘.Vof.’the””i’e–s’pondent herein. In the
said sugar, petirtiehegi-is:dha§}e..fi’iedi1.A.e on 3.2.10, to stay the
operation xi’-and Vexecution of the decree passed in
b§””bri.ngirng to the notice of the Court that,
the’ .deFenda«nt”i..n the suit has instituted E.P.7/O5 and the
decree i«i”i”<.j_c_-élixfyto be executed.
3.7.1H.e4ard the learned counsel on both the sides and
"..fwperiusedHthe writ petition papers. LL
'/'
,#
4. Indisputediy, I.A.6 has not been considered___and
disposed of. In the circumstances of the matteryjvrithiotiyt
going into the merit or otherwise of the contesjtionsii’rai”seG:i ‘
on both sides, I deem it appropzriarteto
proceedings in E.P.7/OS oniy tun I.;}’-\.6::’_’i_A’iii”eVd ino-sy.ss;*’io~sf’is[y_
considered and disposed or’ ,
In order to expedite thieiicourtiwherein
O.S.66/O6 is pending; to hear and
dispose of I.A_,v6-filed expedition and
at any event’, tt4~ro.y.m’oinths from the date
a copy.ivof–‘this’orderis ‘o’nui–ts record by either of the
parties:._’ of the order passed on
I.A.6 in d§£¥…_Vi56/£56,’ the ‘Execution Court shail take note of
the»*’-result _there”of….a.n.o’ proceed further in the matter in
a,cco.rd an’ce’w’ith_ law.
” A stands disposed of accordingly.
sa/–
Judge
” Sect?