Gujarat High Court High Court

Kandla vs Union on 29 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Kandla vs Union on 29 November, 2010
Author: Akil Kureshi,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/8754/1997	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8754 of 1997
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3983 of 1994
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 13018 of 1994
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 970 of 2001
 

In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8754 of 1997
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 11705 of 2000
 

In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3983 of 1994
 

With


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 1863 of 1994
 

In SPECIAL CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 3983 of
1994 
=========================================================

 

KANDLA
PORT STEVEDORS ASSOCIATION & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

UNION
OF INDIA & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
MEGHA JANI for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. 
MR DHAVAL G NANAVATI for Respondent(s) :
1, 
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 - 3. 
MR DHAVAL D VYAS
for Respondent(s) : 2 - 3. 
MR RJ OZA for Respondent(s) :
4, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
		
	

 

Date
: 29/11/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

1. I have heard learned
Counsel for the parties.

2. From the documents
on record, it emerges that, with a common consensus, a new policy for
granting licenses for stevedoring has been formulated in the year,
2010, which is governed by the Kandla Port (Licensing of Stevedore)
Regulations, 1988. If, the petitioners are desirous of getting such
license and or renewal, if so permitted, shall apply to the Port
Trust, as and when such applications are called for. Learned Counsel
for the Kandla Port Trust submitted that, if such an application is
made, same shall be considered in accordance with the rules,
regulations, provisions and policies of the Port Trust.

3. In view of the
above, these petitions are disposed of. Notice in each petition is
discharged.

4. Since, the main
matters are disposed of, civil applications shall not survive, they
also stand disposed of, accordingly. Notice / Rule in respective
application, is discharged.

(AKIL
KURESHI, J.)

Umesh/

   

Top