IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36876 of 2011
Kanhaiya Mahto @ Kanhaiya Kumar, Son of Bochu Mahto, Resident of
Village-Tartar, P.S.-Barahiya, District-Lakhisarai.
.....Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Bihar .....Opposite Party.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : APP.
----------------------------------
02/ 09.11.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the
petitioner and learned Counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case
which has been registered under Section 392
of the Indian Penal Code against Shambhu
Singh @ Bhutta and two unknown. The informant
was returning after performing last riots. In
the way he and others were intercepted and
robbers snatched the gold chain of the
informant. The villagers told that the
offence was being committed by Shambhu Singh
@ Bhutta of Village Barahiya.
Submission is that the petitioner
is not named in the First Information Report,
has not been put on Test Identification
Parade as yet and nothing has been recovered.
Except confessional statement of Shambhu
Singh @ Bhutta the petitioner’s complicity
has not been found. The petitioner is a man
of fair antecedent.
2
Considering the facts and
circumstances of the case, the above named
petitioner is directed to be released on bail
on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten
thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court
concerned, Lakihsarai in connection with
Barahiya P.S. Case No. 62 of 2011.
(Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)
kksinha/-