High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Kapildeo Shukla vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 26 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Kapildeo Shukla vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 26 September, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3832 of 2007
                    Kapildeo Shukla son of Late Madhu Shukla, village
                    Maruabag, P.O. Mehsi, P.S. Mehsi, District East
                    Champaran at Motihari              ...             ...    Petitioner
                                               Versus
                    1. The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner and
                       Secretary,      Human         Resources       Development
                       Department, Vikas Bhawan, Patna
                    2. Commissioner and Secretary, Human Resources
                       Development Department, Vikas Bhawan, Patna
                    3. Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Vikas Bhawan,
                       Patna
                    4. Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut
                       Division, Muzaffarpur              ...       .... Respondents
                                  ----------------------------------

02/ 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner

and the State, who has filed counter affidavit duly

affirmed by the Regional Deputy Director of

Education, Tirhut Division on 19.9.2011 without

serving copy thereof in advance on the learned

counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances,

averments made therein are not to be taken into

consideration as learned counsel for the State is not

ready to pay cost to the learned counsel for the

petitioner for delayed service of the counter affidavit

on the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner superannuated while serving on

the post of Block Education Extension Officer in the
2

Lower Division of the Bihar Subordinate Education

Service with effect from 31.1.1995. He has filed this

writ petition praying, inter alia, to direct the

authorities of the State to consider his case for

granting him seniority in the Bihar Subordinate

Education Service from the year 1975 as was done in

case of those who were brought to the Lower

Division of the Bihar Subordinate Education Service

in the first transaction.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner

that his aforesaid prayer was not being considered by

the State- authorities as petitioner was not confirmed

in the Lower Division of the Bihar Subordinate

Education Service which confirmation has come to

the petitioner and others under order bearing Memo

No. 105 dated 21.1.2011 annexed along with the

supplementary affidavit, copy whereof was served on

the counsel for the State on 12.9.2011.

Having heard counsel for the parties,

petitioner is directed to represent before the Director,

Primary Education, Bihar, Patna for granting him

seniority and consequential benefit with effect from
3

the year 1975 annexing a copy of this order as also

the order dated 21.1.2011, whereafter the Director,

Primary Education shall pass appropriate order in the

matter as early as possible in any case within two

months from the date of receipt of the representation

along with a copy of this order. In case, petitioner is

allowed seniority from the earlier time, he be paid

consequential benefit until the date of superannuation

i.e. 31.1.1995 as also his pension be revised within

the same time.

Arjun/                                    ( V. N. Sinha, J.)