IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.9137 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: JULY 02, 2009
Karamjit Singh
.....PETITIONER
Versus
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
and others
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
---
Present: Mr.Naresh Prabhakar, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
..
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.
The petitioner, who is working as Draftsman in the respondent-
University, has filed the instant petition for quashing the advertisement
dated 19.5.2009 issued by the respondent-University, whereby the
applications have been invited for appointment on the post of Architect on
contractual basis.
It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner, who has been
admitted as member of Council of Architect, is fully eligible to be promoted
on the post of Architect. Therefore, if the aforesaid appointment is made on
contractual basis, the promotional avenue of the petitioner will be adversely
affected.
Concededly, the line of promotion for the post of Architect is
Junior Draftsman, Draftsman, then Senior Draftsman, then Architectural
Assistant, thereafter Assistant Architect and then Architect. At present, the
petitioner is working as Draftsman, therefore, immediately he cannot be
C.W.P. No.9137 of 2009 -2-
promoted to the post of Architect. Thus, he has no locus standi to challenge
the action of the respondents for appointing the Architect on contractual
basis.
No merits. Dismissed.
July 02, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE