High Court Karnataka High Court

Karekunna Hamsa @ Kuppikanda … vs State Of Karnataka on 12 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Karekunna Hamsa @ Kuppikanda … vs State Of Karnataka on 12 October, 2010
Author: V.Jagannathan


. 1 .

I}? Tim FHGH CQURT CF KARNATAKA AT BANGELORE
mmn ms THE 12»: my 02? oc’roB_g_i=;{ ~.. A
BEFORE : & %

THE Hcmam MR.JUsn:;Ev.qa;§A1«fz;e;i*1–m: ‘

Sin Sydalnvi,

Tirur talufk.-Yellamachgfi, V’
Kavapurakm. Malaymm dime;

…PET1TIOHER
(By s§:z{A.su4gr§2m;%%aav.;
%%%%%

” _ ‘TH&po1:Iu”R:xlice station,
A V by S.P.P.,

Ccilrt. Bumiflg,
Bm%m. SPDHDEHT

V’ . H Sfi.P. , HCGH

‘I’!&Cr1.P.?nflad1uxim-Sact’ion4~39oft}m
Cr.P.C. praying an enlarge tm petitionsmr cm bail in
Cir.Ho.58]2010 of Hapoldu P.S., Kadagu, Madilmi,
which E regtcred for the afiemw PIUISE-. 454, 45′?
&380of

This CrLP. comm on for erdwa thia

made the following-

Haard both sidaa”ig§;’~~ «of

%d under Smtinz; 539 A

2. Petitic-rm? _ acxxustad persam
agaans’ t a the Napokhx
polme- ‘f°£’~ ofietiam puniahablc
as 380 of}PC.

allamatiurm in short are that, the

__ ‘1?.–:%:d’ gene to Banflm to meet her
V ak returned to 1m’ on
Fat about 9.30 a..m.. am when ahe wmt to

‘henna, she fiaumi thfit af goldan .

V. an than eemplaint when by her. the police have

ryktarfi the above said case.

4. Suhmiaainn of the pefifinzmx-‘e Cozumel is that
thconly afiagafionwkmtflmpetmsormriathatlfi
in’m1vemm1t is n the cxzzsfmsicn atatnexmxttt said

‘ he have been made by aazxrused No.1

accused No.1 was rebaaed

c.Misc.na.36s/ 2010

placed on than be no

c».ma.1s~9;%1§:b ‘ note of the race; that

releaaed on bail by that

any reason tn refuse bail to 1:113

V alaa placed on the similar footizg so
A ._ are .

u In the result, petitinn as alkxwed, subjact in

(i) The petitioner shall be rekzaaed on bail
onbzb exwumaperaonalbaonclfora
sum bf Rs.50,000{- with twee aurcw
far the limmn to the satisfaction of
the trial court.

3i/–