High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Kari Rai @ Karia @ Kari vs State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Kari Rai @ Karia @ Kari vs State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2010
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Cr.Misc. No.22183 of 2010
            KARI RAI @ KARIA @ KARI, S/o Late Nepali Rai.
                               Versus
                        THE STATE OF BIHAR
                              -----------

02. 12.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Sections 458 and 380 of the

Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is

not named in the First Information Report and

subsequently his name was disclosed in the

confessional statement of the co-accused and an

attache was recovered from his shed but there is no

description about the same.

                            Considering     the     same     and     that     the

                   petitioner's   father    undertakes      responsibility     of

                   petitioner's   conduct   after   his    release     from   jail

custody, let the petitioner, above named be released

on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No.

158 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i)
2

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy

as to how he is related with the petitioner and the

other bailor shall be the wife of the petitioner. The

bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there

is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That

the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will

inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding

for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he

will receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do

so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date and if he fails to do so on

two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-