IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BAN
DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF JUNE, ms
PRESENT_W__
THE HON'!-ISLE MR. JUSTICE VS.R:.'B;5#Ni$1'fjf€1S)E£;'fi§_':--.._:"
THE HON'BLE__.MR. ku;samR.a. N'AIK./i
ccc. No.7*:3<5~
Karnataka R:ajy{.é14S};;':Ait.'1.é "
No.21, Savitha' .. '
Journalist CoIoI1y,;j_ ' ' _ 'a
Banga1ore---4369 1302 ," 1;, « _
Rep by its Prcsid€::1tV_ = . .
Sri B.K.Vasud_cva_ '
S /0 Late B; Aafljaricyalu, '
Aged about 67.Vyea1-f3'. _ " .. COMPLAINANT.
" (By Rats,' ' Advocate)
Majpr agcf:-,
~V IJist;t"ipt"Regstrar of Societies,
"Bangalere Urban District,
& k No;:'2:;}/ 1 (Old No.59),
'Ci11t_rfc:h Street,
3&3! Floor, Bangalorc~560 001.
2. Sri. Sampath Kumar,
S/o Late Nanjundappa,
Aged about 61 years,
Ooc: Business, R/o Rajajinagar,
Bangalore-560 010.
(BySri.A.G. Shivanna, AGA., for A-:"I.p&i_d -. 2
M.V. Chandrashekara Reddy,' for Af2)i._j
Contempt of Court Act 'the accused for
disobeying the order dated passed in
W. P.No.7450/200'? gGM--KsR;yide..Am1exwe --- "A".
This COG ion "for"V"OrdeIs, this day,
oonten1;jtj:p::pefition__ has been filed allegm' g
disobedience' Qf passed by this Court in
v4_W.P.No."§f4$b/2O(i7""{GM»KSR) dated 06.09.2007 Where
thus:
1 petitioners shall call for the general
body and hold election Within three
I_ months from today;
The petitioners shall notify the second
'V V' " and an observer shall be appointed
by 'respondent No.1 to over-see the general
body nlceting as Well as the election process.”
E”
2. On issuance of notice of this contempt _
accused No.1 has been represented tliroughs
Additional Government Advocate. Ski A.(3_:;”
learned AGA. Accused No.2 is id.
Chandrashekara Reddy. Add medeedeeef,
inter alia contending that far of. lgeneralibody
meeting is concerned, it ttie of the
society and as ‘_:t_\tto in the
society, they elelectlon because of
infighting t as appointment of
an obsexventgy is ‘ concerned, an observer
has been appointed-fotf conduct of election and the
has the society and the authorities
hdfJ’eL’1″et1ueet1-:dt to start election process. At
counsel for conlplam ant submits
_ .elect1or3.Vv’os’ocess are being started.
5.’ “~_.On careful scrutiny of the counter filed by the
“.’ji’e_$;§ondent, the delay is explained by cogent reasons.
l’ in mind the cause of delay and the length of time
1?’,/IL
taken for appoinfing an election observer, We:
1′.’
there is no merit in complai11ant’s contenticfms. :0;
the submissions made by the _respectiifé Céé;:1§e1,j;. 1:15 ;
unimccssary to proceed further ‘
Accordingly, the contempt
