IN THE HIGH COURT op’ KARNATAKA AT BAz_w;GAL;§__:§:~V: _’
DATED THIS THE 131*}! DAY ore’ T , V
BEFORE; [ T _ _ _ _
THE HOPPBLE iv!R.V»Jt_fS’TI:if}:!?3_:i~:.,A.1aP””‘*’»” -‘ZEE ii 1 pk
gmmNAI;_gwEnT1oNfigL§4s9%Q1:g;:_;_:§k
2. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL: cogmififiirzon
NO.§f1,THIMMAIA§i”‘R&i%m, ‘- ; AV ‘
NEAR CAb¥}”‘Q_?~3i%6E¥&]’i’ RAI.1.’WAY ‘S7FATIO§i
BANGAL€_!RE§7r32_.E3Y {TS ,nEP1mr GEHERAL
MANAGE}? SR} V-3;; M-._PAI}MA:NfixBH£.’
S10 M 1§m1g.eKR1sa2¢A;VV53 YEARS .. PE’1’I’E’IONER
{£3’§?éii;’:TA 19;” 7; Axfvfh, Aafiocaféj’ V
13*
2
C3′
1 RUD1réEsHA.P?A__ 97. S
;s,- Q VEERAPPA, MAJOR
V ~ ‘ /VA ‘i¥lANKAE;ALE_.V’1LLAGE
sA4§fi\R’é’T£tLUK, SHIMOGA ‘DIS’I’RiC’l’
T ” ‘.:?tA’1§ E’Ka&HATAxA
._ BY’ASS1S’IfhN’I’ REGKJNAL TRANSPORT
g_ ?OFFICE’f§,*SAGAR–5?7 401 Rsspowomrrs
(By $r;,é.§aALAKR1sHNA, I-ICGP FOR R2:
‘ ” ‘~ . ‘ x12T.1 smvmmy
: C§RL.P FILED U I SA82 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE
% V Pf2ecEEDzms1rz;31aTE;:3’BY sscom azspmszmm AGAINST
” -»v*r+z1:«: PETE. IN cc.1s:o, 393/03 on was ms 012’ THE ADDL.
C.J.(JR.Di’£.) AND ABEL. JMFC, sA<3AR.
This petition, wming on far haaring, this day, the
Court, made the following:
regstered owner or person who is in _
control over the motor vehicle.
The financier is not liable 2:, i§o o T
shown that financier was _4posoosSion aziériu.
over the motor vehicle. a K <
5. The learned to the
Provisions of ‘ Vehicles
Taxation Ac}; ‘V II accused —–
financier. ____ the charge shoot
that mgmg H II accused was in
possessioii motor vehicle beam)’ g
VNo.KAg§2OiB»999(}»… %%%%% § &
.A this, there is legal bar to continue
23¢ accusw. Therafore, the
V petitioii aooepted. The impugned proceedings as
. ” relgatoto II accused are quashed. A …. ..
Sd/1
Iudg’