High Court Karnataka High Court

Karnataka State Industrial … vs M/S Shimoga Steels Ltd on 2 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Karnataka State Industrial … vs M/S Shimoga Steels Ltd on 2 February, 2009
Author: N.Ananda
IN

DATED THIS THE 2% DAY OF,.FEBRii'AR ?';V2C§f}$'.VV @ %

THE HIGH CQURT OF KARNATAKA AT BA§n:%;}iLC:x¢';'fi  A.

BEFORE  Q
THE HONBLE MR. Jismicfi' 'N.ArJA1~zf§AAVV.i.'-._, 

CRIMINAL PETITIQN E~fC}§1972 

RETW FERN:

1 .

AND

KARNATAKA S--'{'ATE £NE3'LE$'i'RI*AL_
£NVES'FME.N':'?.AND  _.   ~ 
DEVEL<3PMEr~;?? <_:QR'Po'RATiQi\H,TD' 
NQ49,;i<H3gN1JA*k;3HA?;*AN'~~.V   '
4TH i?'L«;::',  '

B,;«3.N1  .

REP B-3:" i'§';S"ism-NAGE'i2TVLE.G4a,L

{By '  2. VI NAYA ';i:U'MAR. _Q..-S, ADVO GATE}

.. PETETIONER

 "3Mf:S SH£MOC3i'>..« STEELS LTD
 K,R.fiS2.]E?C3AD,

A " ~ _ Ivis?;~'m:3ALL.Y

" . MYVSQKE" 5f?:6

  ~93-_%. __I'["§3' CHAIRMAN ANS
MAi'§AGE.J's&3 DIRECTOR

_ SANTHANARAMAN
 {BY 8

 RESPONEIENT
m.B.'{.RAMAN, Anvo<:;a.TE;

AA «CRE¥.P FELED U;'S.48i2 GREG FRAYENG TO SET ASIDE 01:2

*  T=3..<:s
   ANNEXURE ''A'' 8:': TC? ALLOW THE CRLJ3'. BY EESTOEING
  C:,:CgN0.289Q4f99 QN THE WLE Ci? THE XVHI F;CMM., B'LC3F3E.

EIASH THE ORDER D'i'.iIZ1.i'2,Q0O6 WHICH ES PFZEBDUCED



 ""t'.'}'{(% 'i¢=,:$M1;*<:f_1-:*,d !\iIHé'gistrat<=: should have awaitm retzlrn

Alflf'aTF3B§?uf':"'{ifid.T'Sh{')1"l}d have r<=:--issned NEW in secure

_»."EV'.L9..gistbaifie has f'mmd fault with camplainant.

_'  'T_h7e1'éf0re, me impilgnerl order cannot be sustained.

This petition, C01"flifig on for hearing, ~ V.
C0u1"'t, made the foilowirlg:  K "  A

The complaint filed  
200 Cr.P.f',. was dis;rn.i§§9.ed  T116
Copy of the order  '-the trial court
would 2*ev<=:a1_,_ A(m_   issued to
respondent;   21. 12.2806 the

leameeilv acfihiéégte 3nd §bV11ght for time. A3′. 3.00
pm. f.hé:’ dismissed the applicatinra

rej:=:c_t_§ng the’ prayei’ of isélrance of NEW.

ac(:i1.5e(i_” ‘h<..=:–fi:)re the trial court. Instead the learned

Pk?' Qxgéi,/'k " I

3

T2. In the I’€S£l1T., the criminal petition is accefiftacl.

The impugned order is set. aside. ‘W”‘i{*’..v~’~~–‘.(“,§’:’–}”.(._’_’I_”i«”V’fi ”

Magistmte is dimctftti to restore:

and proceed with the case: in QCC{)T(i£1I1C€fi itfitii ‘ia_W.–..
1′ >1 ” >. /V’.

“1d9°

(rm/~